Don't Blame Sullivan for Mika Benching

The big story at Madison Square Garden last night wasn't that the New York Rangers lost to the much-improved Anaheim Ducks 4-1; their 12th loss in 16 home games and the ninth time this season they've been held to one goal or less on their own ice.

The big story was that Mike Sullivan benched Mika Zibanejad for being late to a team meeting and that was the reason they lost. Yes, Mika Zibanejad, who we're now supposed to believe is the second coming of Guy Lafleur, was so vital to his team's chances that without his presence, they did pretty much what they've been doing all year long: they shit the bed. Had it not been for a fluke gaol by Matthew Robertson, they would've suffered their sixth shutout of the season. And it's not even Christmas yet. 

I'm sorry, but did Mika play in the season opener against the Penguins? Did he play against the Capitals or the Oilers or the Wild or the Hurricanes or the Islanders or the Red Wings or the Lightning? Let me save you the trouble of looking it up: he did. Wanna know what the Rangers record was in those games? 0-8.

That the beat writers of this team would even suggest that Zibanejad's absence had any bearing on the outcome of this game is embarrassing. For the record, the reason the Blueshirts lost last night was because they surrendered a shorthanded goal while on a 5v3 power play and Igor Shesterkin whiffed on a shot by Cutter Gauthier to put the Ducks up 2-1 in the third period that nine times out of ten he stops. If you're going to grill Sullivan over anything how about his stubbornness in sticking with five forwards on the first power play unit, which is now 0-21 and has allowed two shorthanded goals? That would be a good place to start, don't you think? If anything, I applaud Sullivan for holding his players accountable. If Brian Daboll had handled his players as well as Sullivan handles his, he might still have his job.

Face it: no team in the NHL works harder at being mediocre than the Rangers. They bring new meaning to the word underwhelming. According to Steve Valiquette, New York had eleven high-danger scoring chances to Anaheim's six, and yet they couldn't convert on one of those chances. The Robertson goal was a mid-danger chance. Unusual? No, just standard operating procedure at the world's most famous arena. I swear these players would have a hard time finishing at a whore house. 

Want to hear something crazy? This team has less talent than the one Jeff Gorton decided to tear down in 2018. Just take a look at the numbers below. These are the adjusted point totals for the top six plus Adam Fox:

As you can see, Panarin is the only player scoring at around a point per game. To quote the great Dean Wormer of Faber College, "Congratulations, Bread, you're at the top of the Delta pledge class."

This isn't a top six; hell, it's barely a middle six. And it's why the Rangers are a middling team that if the season were to end today would miss the playoffs for the second straight year.

Nothing about this roster excites you; nothing in the pipeline excites you. The most encouraging thing you can say about this franchise is that if they continue at the pace they're on, they have a half-way decent shot of getting a lottery pick in next year's draft; that's assuming Drury doesn't do something stupid and trade it away. 

Seriously, I don't know how anybody looks at this team and says, "Oh, yeah, they're good." Good for what? If the word disappointment could be trademarked, the Rangers would be the General Motors of the NHL.

Over the last 50 years, I've had a front-row seat to four rebuilds: the mid-'70s; the late '80s; the late '90s to the early '00s; and the late 2010s. I've seen players come and go. And that's why I'm imploring Chris Drury to do the right thing and start another one.

Please spare me all the "But they're only two points out of a wild card spot" drivel. So in two years we've gone from winning the Presidents' trophy to possibly being the eight seed? If that's your argument, I don't want to hear it. Look at what the Knicks are doing. Now that's a team with a real shot at winning a championship. By comparison, the Rangers look like the guy who stayed too long at the bar and now can't get a ride home.

I'd love to be a fly on the wall when Drury tells Dolan this team, as currently constructed, can't win, especially since he's the principal architect of it. He won't be a happy camper, I can assure you of that, It isn't every day that you see a franchise have two rebuilds in less than a decade. Drury will be lucky if he isn't fired. And if you think Dolan wouldn't fire his GM, guess again. The man's paying Tom Thibodeau $30 million to NOT coach the Knicks. Somehow I don't think money is going to influence him one way or the other. 

But while doing a rebuild is risky, not doing it is far riskier. Every team in the Eastern Conference not named the Buffalo Sabres is deeper and younger than the Rangers, including a certain team that plays in Elmont. The longer Drury waits, the worse this situation will get.

Neil Smith waited too long to start his rebuild, and the Rangers went seven years without qualifying for the postseason. 

Welcome to the New York Brewers

It's hard to believe that a year ago this month, the Mets, fresh off an NLCS appearance against the Dodgers, signed the top free agent of the offseason, and arguably the best player in baseball, Juan Soto, to a 15 year, $765 million contract. Steve Cohen could've run for mayor and he would've won in a landslide. The Flushing Faithful had visions of a parade down the Canyon of Heroes dancing in their heads.

What a difference a year makes. After jumping out to a huge lead in the National League East in mid-June, the Amazins slowly imploded over the last three and half months of the season. Not only did they not win the World Series, they didn't even qualify for the playoffs. A Mets team with a $342 million payroll lost out to a Cincinnati Reds team with a $119 million payroll.

David Stearns, the man hired by Cohen to run the organization, quickly went to work. On November 23, he traded outfielder Brandon Nimmo to the Texas Rangers for second baseman Marcus Semien. So far, so good. While Nimmo was a fan favorite, as I wrote at the time, he was hardly Ted Williams. Semien may have had an off year in '25, but he is generally viewed as an outstanding fielder who will solidify the Mets infield. Stearns apparently meant it when he said he would focus on "run prevention."

Next, Stearns signed Devin Williams - another ex-Yankee - to a three-year, $51 million contract. While Williams struggled in the Bronx, he had three very good years in Milwaukee. As a set-up man to Edwin Diaz, the Mets would finally have what they'd been looking for since the days of Orosco and McDowell: a devastating one-two punch at the back of the bullpen.

The off-season was shaping up very nicely. Mets fans eagerly anticipated the Winter meetings where the expectation was that Stearns - with the aid of Cohen's checkbook - would trade for Tarik Skubal and sign either Kyle Tucker or Cody Bellinger. No one, and I mean no one, was prepared for what happened next.

It began on December 9, when the Dodgers signed Diaz to a three-year, $69 million contract. Losing Diaz to the team that had beaten them in '24 was bad enough, but losing him over what amounted to $3 million over three years left a very bad taste in the mouths of every fan. As I wrote at the time, this was an epic failure for the organization.

But what followed the very next day shook the Flushing Faithful to their core. Pete Alonso, the franchise home-run king, who, like Diaz, had opted out of his contract, was signed by the Baltimore Orioles to a five-year, $155 million deal. Adding insult to injury was the revelation that the Mets didn't even bother to make the Polar Bear an offer. All we know for certain is that Stearns wasn't willing to go more than three years.

For the last couple of days I've been trying to wrap my head around what happened. I've gone from shock to anger to frustration and finally to profound sadness. The team that was two wins away from going to the World Series in '24 is now being broken up and there's not a damn thing I, or any other Mets fan, can do about it. Yes, they severely underachieved last year, but typically rosters that underachieve are bolstered, not split apart.

Let's get something straight: this was not an accident; it was deliberate. Nor was it about run prevention. If it were, would the Mets have allowed their best run preventer to walk for a measly $1m per year? No, what this was about was transforming a franchise that in 2025 paid almost $80 million in luxury tax for a team that won 83 games. If you want to know what Stearns' vision for the Mets is, go to Spotrac and take a gander at the Milwaukee Brewers 2025 payroll. Now add $61.8 million - the exact amount Soto will make next season - $19 million in retained salaries for Frankie Montas and Nimmo, plus another $20 million and you have next year's payroll for the Mets. That's right folks: $238 million, $6 million below the tax threshold for 2026.

That means no Skubal, no Tucker, no Bellinger and no Robert Suarez, who signed with the Atlanta Braves for three years, $45 million. For the foreseeable future Dollar Store Dave will continue to shop for bargains and team-friendly contracts. Don't be surprised if Paul Goldschmidt ends up replacing Alonso at first base next season. As for the starting rotation: Nolan McLean, Jonah Tong and Brandon Sproat will be given every chance to make it. 

Why? That's the sixty-four thousand dollar question. Why would an organization owned by a multi-billionaire suddenly get so tight with its money? Circle this date on your calendar: December 1, 2026. That's when the current CBA between the owners and the players expires.

Over the last 53 years there have been eight labor disputes: four players strikes and four owners lockouts. The most damaging of these disputes occurred in 1994 when the players went on strike over a proposed salary cap by the owners. That resulted in the cancellation of the World Series for the first time since 1904. It would take major league baseball several years to recover from the damage to its reputation. 

I believe we are headed towards another work stoppage, only this time I think the owners are serious about implementing some kind of cap. Maybe not as severe and exacting as the one the NHL adopted after its successful lockout in 2005; but perhaps something along the lines of the apron system currently employed by the NBA.

Unlike '94, however, most of these owners have the financial wherewithal to withstand a long work stoppage, meaning we could be looking at a year or more of no baseball. In fact, I wouldn't be at all surprised if the players went on strike sometime in the late summer if they think the owners are going to lock them out in December.

If the owners are successful in implementing their cap, any team above that cap when play resumes will either have to shed salary or face severe penalties; and by penalties I don't mean paying a luxury tax. Now you know why Cohen went from Daddy Warbucks to Scrooge in just a few days. You don't have to shed what you don't have. Which makes you wonder why he went after Soto in the first place. Imagine what the Mets could've done with that money.

Bottom line: Stearns hasn't gone rogue; he's doing this at the behest of his employer. 

Welcome to the New York Brewers, people. Get used to it. 

Dollar Store Dave Strikes Again

I won't mince words here. Losing Edwin Diaz to the Dodgers was an epic failure for David Stearns and the Mets organization. And the way it went down will sting for a very long time. 

To sum up, here's what happened. After the season ended, Diaz opted out of his contract that still had two years remaining with an AAV of $20.4 million. Stearns offered him a three-year deal with an AAV of $22 million. So, basically, the Mets offered inarguably their best pitcher, and arguably their third best player, a pay increase of $1.6 million. They then told his agent to "circle back" to them in the event another team came to the table with a higher offer.

For those not familiar with the art of negotiating, Stearns broke every rule in the book. First, he knew Diaz was not happy with his contract, hence the opting out; second, his offer of a $1.6 million raise was an insult to his closer; and third, he added insult to that injury by actually having the nerve to tell his agent to "circle back" to him if he received a higher offer. In other words, Stearns could've offered more and he chose not to. 

Don't blame Diaz for this. He went with the higher offer. Free agents do that all the time. And don't blame the Dodgers. What were they supposed to do, not sign him? The blame here lies squarely with Stearns. 

I spent 25 years in sales, 13 of them in retail. It is an axiom among people in my profession that you never allow the customer to walk without making your best offer. And above all else you never say "if you find a better price bring it back to me." You might as well kiss that customer goodbye. My managers would always chide me whenever I got pissed that I lost a sale. "Don't blame the customer," they would say. "It's your fault for not closing them."

They were right.

If Stearns could've offered more, he should've done so before the Dodgers got into the act. Going cheap the way he did made it that much easier for them to swoop in and sign him. And as far as "circling back," let's get something straight: there is no obligation on the part of a player agent to give the home team the last shot. Juan Soto was a special case. Scott Boras knew he had a bidding war between three teams; two of which were the Yankees and Mets. It was in his client's best interest to drag the process out as long as possible. Most teams know, or at least are told, that they need to make their best offer up front. The irony in this fiasco is that after the season Stearns said his primary focus would be "run prevention." Well he just let his number one run preventer leave.

My fear is that this isn't a one-off. I'm not a betting man, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if Pete Alonso is wearing a Red Sox uniform next year. The Mets were lucky last offseason. Alonso had an off year in 2024. That gave them the leverage they needed to re-sign him to a team-friendly deal. However he rebounded very nicely in '25 to have one of his best seasons as a Met. You can bet the ranch Boras will find a team that will be willing to meet his demands; whether that's Boston or Baltimore - the other team rumored to be interested in signing Pete.

And if Alonso leaves, you can flush next season down the drain. I'm serious. Who do you think provided Soto all that protection in the lineup? How many more times would he have been intentionally walked without the Polar Bear batting behind him? Even with Alonso, the Mets were a top heavy team. Without him, they'd be the fucking S.S. Poseidon on New Year's Eve. [If you don't know the reference there, you're too young.]

Why would a team owned by Steve Cohen, a billionaire 23 times over, be so penny wise and dollar foolish? I think the below chart might offer an explanation. 

Several things stand out. 1. Only the Dodgers had a larger payroll going into 2025 than the Mets; 2. the Mets made $444 million in revenue in '24, $308 million less than the Dodgers; and 3. they spent 90 percent of that revenue on salaries plus luxury tax, by far the largest percentage of any team in the majors. And that includes the $61 million Soto is getting.

I have no way of proving it, but I think Cohen didn't expect to win the Soto sweepstakes. The prevailing sentiment was that if the offers were close, he would return to the Bronx. Indeed, the Mets bid was only $5 million more than the Yanks. As elated as the fanbase was at the time, in retrospect, Stearns could've used that money to beef up a pitching staff, which as we know all too well, was terrible last season. While the Yankees used the savings to sign Max Fried, who went 19-5 with an ERA of 2.86, the Mets went with a rotation of Moe, Larry, Curly and Shemp.

It's entirely possible that Stearns has been told by Cohen to trim payroll wherever possible and seek out more team-friendly contracts. That was his specialty when he was with the Milwaukee Brewers. While the Dodgers are putting together a package to land Tarik Skubal, the Flushing Faithful may have to be satisfied with getting Devin Williams.

I hope I'm wrong; I hope Pete re-signs with the Mets and they get a big-name starter. I'm just not getting my hopes up. 39 years of frustration can make a cynic out of even the Pope.

And he's a White Sox fan. 

A Knicks Trade That Actually Makes Sense

Giannis Antetokounmpo is disappointed with the Milwaukee Bucks. So much so that Jon Hurst reached out to Leon Rose over the summer to see whether there was any interest in bringing the Greek Freak to Manhattan. And if there was, what players would he be willing to give up in a trade. We're not sure how long the phone call lasted, but suffice to say the offer Rose made went about as far as a Mitchell Robinson free throw attempt.

Let's get real. Giannis makes $54 million. The Knicks are hard-capped at the second apron. The only way they can take on his salary would be to unload $54 million the other way; $54 million in, $54 million out. Got it? That means Rose would have to trade a significant portion of a core that last season was two wins away from reaching the NBA finals for the first time in 26 years, just to accommodate a player who's unhappy with where he is.

Well, boo hoo. Life is tough. As Mick Jagger once sang, "You can't always get what you want."

Forget for a moment that this would be the third major trade Rose would be making in the last two years - the Mikal Bridges deal doesn't count because it only involved draft picks going the other way - where's the incentive here for the Knicks? Not only does it not make them better, it actually makes them worse. As I wrote in a piece this past October, without Bridges - who I assume would be one of the players headed to Milwaukee - New York doesn't beat Boston in the conference semi-finals last May.

No disrespect intended but what has Giannis done since winning the title in 2021? He's a great player, sure, but he's no Nikola Jokic. And his team has been one of the biggest postseason disappointments over the last four years, while the Knicks have been one of the more pleasant surprises. The only way I'd consider taking Giannis off Milwaukee's hands is if they retained half his salary and were willing to accept bench players in return. Not interested? Have a nice day.

No, if Rose is going to make any trade at all, it'll likely be for a complementary player that adds to the depth of this roster, not subtracts from it. And, ironically, the Bucks have such a player: Bobby Portis. The 6-9 power forward / center would fit in nicely on a Knicks team that could use a little more beef in its front court. And at $13 million, he's cheap. Rose could offer them Robinson and a first rounder to get it done. 

Portis is no stranger to New York; he briefly played here in 2019-20 before joining the Bucks the following season for their championship run. He averages 12 points and seven rebounds per game. And unlike Whack-a-Mitch, he actually makes his free throws.

Imagine a roster that includes KAT, Portis, Anunoby, Bridges, Josh Hart, Jalen Brunson, Deuce McBride, Jordan Clarkson, Guerschon Yabusele, Landry Shamet and Tyler Kolek. I'd say that's pretty impressive and deep. Is it good enough to go to the finals? That remains to be seen. One thing's for certain: gutting it for one player, even one as talented as Giannis, won't get this franchise any closer to its goal of winning a title. Indeed, it would be Carmelo Anthony, Part Deux. 

Bottom line: Rose assembled this roster. It's the best roster the Knicks have had since the days of Pat Riley in the 1990s. It deserves a chance to win.

Fox Injury Could Be Blessing in Disguise for Rangers

Let's be clear: even with Adam Fox playing his best hockey in two years, the Rangers were still three points behind the Philadelphia Flyers for the last wild card spot in the Eastern Conference. Now that the former Norris trophy winner has suffered an injury to his left shoulder that will keep him on LTIR for at least a month - perhaps longer - the prospects for them making the playoffs went from slim to "Don't make me laugh!"

Win some, lose some, may be what you tell your kid after a tough loss, but in the world of collegiate and pro sports, there is no such consolation prize. To quote Bill Parcels, "you are what your record says you are." And right now, the Rangers are two games above .500. The best thing you could say about this team is that they're better in their own zone than last year's team. In 2024-25, they were 19th in the NHL with 255 goals against; in 2025-26, they're 11th with 71 goals against.

But while the defense has improved from last year, it has come at the expense of the offense. When the Rangers won the Presidents' trophy two seasons ago, Artemi Panarin had 34 multi-point games. This season, he has only six such games, registering six goals and 13 assists. The Blueshirts are 6-0 in those games. In the other 21 games, he has a paltry two goals and five assists, and New York has gone 7-12-2.

By no means is the Bread Man the only culprit on this team. Something is clearly wrong with J.T. Miller. He has seven goals and seven assists in 25 games. Not counting the pandemic-shortened season of 2020-21, he is on track to finish with his lowest point total since his first full season with the Tampa Lightning in 2018-19. And it isn't just his lack of offense that is disconcerting. In a game against the Vegas Golden Knights earlier this season, he appeared to give up on a play that led to a Vegas goal. He was called out by Steve Valiquette in the post-game show.

At the risk of repeating myself, this is not a good team; decent yes, but hardly good. Good teams don't go 2-8-1 at home, and they don't get shutout in five of those losses. In the salary cap era, only one team - the 2015-16 San Jose Sharks - has made the playoffs with a losing record at home. And unlike that Sharks team which went to the Stanley Cup finals, there is nothing about this Rangers team that would lead a reasonably objective person to believe they are contenders. Far from it. 

Well fate appears to have intervened just in the nick of time. With Fox out for the foreseeable future, Chris Drury now has the excuse he needs to finish what he started last year, and what his predecessor Jeff Gorton tried to do: a thorough rebuild. Barring a James Dolan meltdown - always a possibility with him - the Rangers should be sellers at the trade deadline. 

Think about it. What is the rationale for keeping this roster together? That maybe, just possibly, they go on a late-season run and sneak into the playoffs, only to be bounced in the first round? The 2017-18 Rangers could've done that, but even Gorton knew that was not a sustainable plan. So he sent out his memo and broke up the core. Face it: the bill comes due for all teams sooner or later, and if we're being totally honest here, this team's bill has been marked "past due" for quite some time.

Those players with no-move clauses like Mika Zibanejad, Panarin and Miller will be impossible to move, I know, but the others should be no problem.  Among the others, Drury needs to waive Conor Sheary right now. Keeping him makes no sense. Taylor Raddysh scored a few goals early in the season, but has done virtually nothing since. Maybe he could get a fourth round pick for him. And before he becomes untradable, Alexis Lafreniere needs to go. If Drury could get Will Borgen and a couple of draft picks for Kaapo Kakko, he should be able to fetch more for the former first overall pick. Carson Soucy is having a good season. But he will be a UFA next summer and will be looking for a long-term extension. He's just the sort of player other teams will be looking to add at the deadline. And under no circumstances should Drury re-sign Panarin. If he won't waive his NMC, thank him for his time on Broadway and let him walk.

Next, bring up the kids, and play them - all of them. Gabe Perrault, Brennan Othmann, Scott Murrow, Brett Berard, Matthew Robertson. It's time to see what's in the cupboard. And by play them, I mean more than six minutes per game. This probably wasn't the deal Mike Sullivan agreed to when he took the job, but deals change all the time. Besides, where's he gonna go, back to Pittsburgh? In case you haven't noticed, the Penguins are doing just fine without him. In fact, between the two teams, the Pens have a better shot of making the postseason than the Rangers.

Is there a risk in doing another rebuild? Of course there is. But keeping the status quo is unacceptable.

Nimmo the First Domino to Fall for Stearns

After the season ended, GM David Stearns said his primary offseason focus would be "run prevention." Well on Sunday, Stearns made the first of what is likely to be several moves meant to address that need. The Mets traded fan favorite Brandon Nimmo to the Texas Rangers for gold glover second baseman Marcus Semien. The Mets also sent $5 million to the Rangers. In order for the deal to be completed, Nimmo was required to waive his no-trade clause.

Semien batted a career-low year .230 in 2025 with 15 home runs and 62 RBIs in 127 games. Two years ago, he batted .276 with 29 HRs and 100 RBIs in 162 games, and had 10 postseason RBIs to help the Rangers win the World Series. Obviously, the Mets are hoping he regains his '23 form. Nimmo batted .262 with 25 HRs and 92 RBIs in 155 games last season.

At first glance it appears as if Stearns is trading offense for defense, but it's far more complicated than that. It's no secret that the Mets had a problem at second base last season. Jeff McNeil, Brett Baty and Luisangel Acuna all took turns playing there; none stood out. Semien not only solves the problem at second, he allows Stearns to include McNeil in a package for a starting pitcher. Wouldn't Tarik Skubal look good in orange and blue? The lone concern I have about Semien is his age. At 35, his best years may be behind him. 

As for Nimmo, yes he was a good hitter, and an even better teammate, but he was hardly irreplaceable. To hear some fans, you'd think Stearns had traded Ted Williams away. There are several notable free agents out there the Mets could target that would be considerably better than Nimmo, both at the plate and in the field.

Kyle Tucker is undoubtedly the biggest fish. A career .273 hitter who averages 31 home runs and 103  runs batted in, he hit .266 with 22 HRs and 73 RBIs for the Cubs last season. Reportedly he's looking for a ten-year contract around $400 million. That might too rich even for Steve Cohen's blood.

If that's the case, Cody Bellinger would make an ideal Plan B. He hit .272 with 29 HRs and 98 RBIs for the Yankees last season, playing primarily in left field. If the Mets sign him, it would be the third free agent they've pilfered from their cross-town rivals in the last two years. Juan Soto and Clay Holmes were the other two.

But while the Mets are looking at prospective free agents this offseason, they have two of their own that will be highly sought after: Edwin Diaz and Pete Alonso. Ideally, Stearns would like to keep both, but that might not be possible. Between the two, Diaz has to be the priority. As bad as the starting rotation was last season, the bullpen was even worse. Diaz was the lone exception. He was 6-3 with 28 saves and a 1.63 ERA. Losing him would deal a devastating blow to whatever hopes Stearns has of putting a pennant-contending team on the field next season.

Regarding Alonso, the issue with him is not so much salary as it is term. The Polar Bear is looking for a seven-year contract and the Mets would prefer not to go beyond three years. Like Nimmo, he can be replaced if the two sides can't agree.

Bottom line, Stearns is making good on his promise to revamp a roster that severely underperformed in 2025. Nimmo was the first domino to fall.

He won't be the last. 

Make That Definite: the Rangers Aren't That Good

About three and a half weeks ago, I wrote a piece titled: "Is It Possible That Maybe the Rangers Just Aren't That Good?" The Rangers had just lost to the Calgary Flames 5-1 to drop their record to a woeful 3-5-2. They couldn't score at home and their top six looked more like a bottom six. "It's time to admit a painful truth," I wrote, "this team may not be as talented as I and others like me thought they were."

Well with less than a week to go before Thanksgiving, it's time to remove the word "maybe" from that title. The sad truth is that the Rangers simply aren't that good. It's not that they haven't had some good moments. They had a 2-0 win against the Canucks in Vancouver and a 3-2 OT win against the Kraken in Seattle; the latter quite possibly the most complete game they've played in over a year. And scoring six goals on only 18 shots against the Nashville Predators at the Garden constitutes front-page headlines these days. 

But apart from those games, and maybe a couple more, 2025-26 is looking remarkably similar to 2024-25, when the Rangers missed the playoffs by just six points. In fact, New York is on track to finish this season with 82 points, three less than they had all of last season. 

It's unsettling to discover that this franchise went through a four-year rebuild just so it can have a three-year window, but that appears to be the case. This core looks old and slow. Apart from Adam Fox and Will Cuylle, every player who was counted on to produce for this team is seriously underperforming. Below are the adjusted point totals for each player over an 82-game schedule.

I'll cut Vincent Trocheck some slack because he missed a month on LTIR, but there's no excuse for players like Artemi Panarin, Mika Zibanejad, JT Miller and Alexis Lafreniere. In 2023-24, the Bread man had 31 multiple point games on his way to a 120 point season. This season, he's had only four such games. 

The problem with Panarin is that if he's not scoring, he's pretty much useless. He doesn't kill penalties and he's the last player you want on the ice if you're protecting a lead. Thursday night in Colorado, two of his turnovers led directly to Avalanche goals: one by Nathan MacKinnon, the other by Cale Makar. Both times the Rangers were ahead by a goal. With him slated to become a UFA at the end of the season, it's highly unlikely that Chris Drury will re-sign him.

Miller and Zibanejad were supposed to be this dynamic duo that would give the Rangers a legit number one line. So far, they've looked more like third liners. Indeed, at times, Noah Laba's line has looked more impressive than Miller and Zibanejad's. As for Lafreniere, he's looking more and more like a bust with each passing game. When Dave Maloney starts calling you out, you know you're bad.

The special teams that were supposed to be the hallmark of this team have been anything but. Thursday night was only the second time this season that the Rangers scored more than one power play goal in a game. They scored twice with the man advantage against the Penguins in Pittsburgh on October 11.

Igor Shesterkin, the rock upon which this franchise was built, look's nothing like the former Vezina trophy winner Drury rewarded with an eight-year, $92 million contract extension a year ago. Indeed, his backup, Jonathan Quick, is having a better season than he is, and for a tenth of the price.

And to think Mike Sullivan left Pittsburgh for this. I don't know promises Drury made to him, but given that the Penguins are currently ahead of the Rangers in the standings, I hope it was worth it. Let's face it, Scotty Bowman wouldn't be able to turn this middling team into a contender. James Dolan may not want to admit it, but the guy he entrusted to run this ship has run it straight into the ground.

I have been a Drury defender from day one; I'm done defending the man. He is currently the GM of a franchise that is in danger of missing the playoffs back-to-back seasons for the first time since Jeff Gorton had that title. And with no tangible plan to fix what's wrong, the prospects for the next several seasons are bleak, to say the least.

And the worst part about what's going on is that while the Rangers spin their wheels, across the Hudson, the Devils are the only team in the New York metro area with a shot at going deep in the playoffs; to the east, the Islanders are very quietly having their best season since 2020-21, when they were one win away from advancing to their first Stanley Cup final since 1984. The Blueshirts are dangerously close to reliving the nightmare of the '80s when they were outplayed and outclassed by their suburban rivals.

It's no longer too early in the season. Twenty-two games is enough of a sample size. The alarm bells are going off. The ship is listing badly and the outlook is dire.

All that's left is for the band to play "Nearer My God to Thee."

OG Anunoby is the Engine That Drives the Knicks

The news that OG Anunoby will be out two weeks after suffering a left hamstring injury against the Miami Heat Friday night at the Garden cannot be overstated. Jalen Brunson may be the captain of the Knicks; Karl-Anthony Towns may be the best scoring center / power forward in the NBA not named Nikola Jokic or Giannis Antekoumpo, but Anunoby is, without question, the most indispensable player on this team. 

No, I have not taken leave of my senses; I'm just going by the numbers.

Let's take a look at the record.

According to StatMuse, when Brunson is in the lineup, the Knicks are 136-85, with a winning percentage of .615.

When Towns is in the lineup, they're 54-31, with a winning percentage of .635.

But when Anunoby is in the lineup, New York is 73-36, with a winning percentage of .670.

To put that into perspective, the Golden State Warriors are 667-371 (.643) with Steph Curry in the lineup. That's right, arguably the greatest pure shooter in NBA history has a lower winning percentage for his team than Anunoby. I'm not comparing the two; obviously, Curry is a first ballot Hall of Famer. Just pointing out that if wins and losses mean anything, OG gets you more wins.

But what about the record when each player is out of the lineup? The Knicks are 19-17 without Anunoby; 20-18 without Brunson; and 5-5 without Towns. It's clear that all three players are badly missed when they're not on the court. It's what happens when they're on the court that's at hand here. 

Want further proof of Anunoby's value to this team? When he's on the court, the Knicks have a defensive rating of 106.4 points per game; when he's off the court, they have a defensive rating of 120.9 points per game. No other player on this roster has that kind of defensive point differential.

Now you know why Leon Rose traded RJ Barrett and Immanuel Quickley to the Toronto Raptors to acquire Anunoby in December, 2023; why he was willing to re-sign him to a five year, $213 million contract extension last year; and why it would be insane for the Knicks to even think about including him in a package to Milwaukee for Giannis. What OG brings to the table cannot simply be measured on a stat sheet.

Put succinctly, Anunoby is one of the most versatile forwards in the league; capable of playing either the three or the four. He's eighth in the league in plus / minus this season with a plus 127. An elite defender who, along with Mikal Bridges, usually guards the opposing teams' best players, he had an integral role in eliminating the Boston Celtics in last year's playoffs.

Under Mike Brown, we were just starting to see how valuable Anunoby's offensive abilities could be. Not counting the game he got hurt, in which he played only five minutes, Anunoby was averaging 17.1 points per game on 48.3 percent shooting from the floor. On a team that stresses ball distribution and finding the open man, Anunoby has the potential to have a breakout season. Imagine having three players on your roster capable of putting up 20 plus points per game. 

Unfortunately, Anunoby also has a history of injuries that predates his arrival in New York. The 74 games he appeared in last season were the most since his rookie season in 2018-19. The fact is every time he goes up to grab a rebound or drives to the basket to take a shot, he's playing Russian Roulette. Sooner or later you know he's going to come up lame. In game two of the 2023 Eastern Conference semi-finals against the Pacers, Anunoby pulled his hamstring chasing down a bad pass that went out of bounds late in the third quarter. FYI, the Knicks won that game to take a 2-0 lead. But Indiana won four of the next five to take the series.

Bottom line, when it comes to OG, you take the bad with the good, because the good is sooo good. And unlike Towns and Bridges, who occasionally go into the witness protection program during the game, even when Anunoby isn't scoring he's doing other things on the court. Only Josh Hart wears more hats on this team.

So that there's no misunderstanding: I'm not saying Brunson and KAT are not valuable. Far from it. This franchise wouldn't be where it is right now without Rose signing Brunson in the summer of 2022. What I am saying is that the Knicks will go only as far as a healthy OG Anunoby takes them.

You may disagree if you like. Just know that the numbers are not on your side. 

Enough Was Enough

Let's be honest: we all knew the season was over after the collapse in Denver three weeks ago. You didn't think the Giants were beating the Philadelphia Eagles or San Francisco 49ers, did you? Neither did I. It wasn't a question of whether a change had to be made, but when.

Well the "when" came yesterday after the Giants blew a ten-point, fourth-quarter lead and lost to the Chicago Bears Sunday afternoon at Soldier Field. That's four times this season New York has lost a game in which they held a double-digit lead; this latest one was the final straw, so the organization "relieved" head coach Brian Daboll of his duties.

I have no problem with the decision. Daboll was 20-40-1 as head coach, but only 11-33 since 2023. He had to go. My only question is why wasn't defensive coordinator Shane Bowen also shown the door? It was his play-calling that directly led to two of those four losses. Indeed, you could easily make the case that had this team defended better, they'd be 5-5, instead of 2-8. And with the worst of the schedule behind them, it's conceivable that the Giants could've been in the playoff hunt going into December. Instead, the only hunt they'll be in is for the number one pick in the 2026 NFL Draft. They currently have the third pick.

That might be the reason why Joe Schoen was retained. In the end, John Mara and Steve Tisch must've felt that, talent wise, the team was headed in the right direction. That isn't to say Schoen hasn't made some mistakes. The decision to give Daniel Jones such a large contract, in hindsight, turned out not to be such a good idea; the whole Saquon Barkley fiasco could've been handled better; and some his draft picks - Evan Neal, Jalin Hyatt and Deonte Banks - haven't exactly panned out.

That being said, the Giants have their franchise quarterback in place; they have an elite receiver and two outstanding running backs; their front seven - at least on paper - is certainly more capable than what they've shown. With some improvements to the secondary, a place-kicker who can stay healthy and the right coaching staff in place, this team should be vastly improved in the standings next season. 

Regarding the latter, who do the Giants hire? If I had my druthers, I'd go with someone along the lines of a Dan Campbell or Mike Vrabel; a no-nonsense coach who holds his players accountable and isn't risk averse. I'm not piling on here, but when Daboll elected to take the field goal rather than go for it on fourth and goal from the one-yard line, I knew the Giants were going to lose. The message that sends to your players is that you don't believe in them. And any coach who doesn't believe in his players has no business being their coach. I guarantee you that Campbell and Vrabel would never do that to their players.

If the Giants are looking for a name, Mike Tomlin makes perfect sense. He's well respected by his players and he has the distinction of being the only active head coach in the NFL to not have a losing season in his 18 years with the Steelers. But would Pittsburgh be willing to let him out of his contract which runs through 2027? Given that the Mara and Rooney families are practically joined at the hip, I'm sure a phone call from John to Art Jr. might get it done. 

If neither option is available, then I would go with someone who can run an offense, like Kliff Kingsbury, former head coach of the Arizona Cardinals, and now offensive coordinator of the Washington Commanders. If he's not available, perhaps Joe Brady of the Bills might suffice. But would Mara and Schoen really want to hire another offensive coordinator with no head-coaching experience? I doubt it. 

One reason the Giants may have fired Daboll now instead of waiting until the end of the season is to give Mike Kafka a look see. The offensive coordinator has been instrumental in Jaxson Dart's development. If he does a good job as interim head coach over the next seven games, they may elect to give him the job permanently.

Whichever route they choose, the Giants will need a defensive coordinator who can actually coach a defense. Ironically, they had one in Wink Martindale, but when Daboll fired two of his assistants, he resigned in protest. That led to the hiring of Bowen, who was the polar opposite of Martindale. 

One man I hope they don't hire is Bill Belichick. There's no doubt about his Hall of Fame bonafides, but with everything that's unfolded at North Carolina, it's obvious that the former New England Patriots head coach is just cashing in on his name. Why on Earth would the Giants want to bring that circus to MetLife?

A lot of possibilities out there for Big Blue, to be sure. Mara and Schoen need to get this one right. The fanbase has suffered long enough.

Jaxson Dart Deserves Better Than This

Since blowing a 19-point lead to the Denver Broncos at Mile-High Stadium on October 19, the New York Giants have lost to the Philadelphia Eagles and the San Francisco 49ers. Neither game was competitive. For the third year in a row this franchise, which has made the playoffs only twice since its last Super Bowl win in 2011, is off to a 2-7 start. The previous two seasons it finished 6-11 and 3-14 respectively. Based on the level of play through nine games, there is little reason to expect that 2025 will be any different. 

New York has given up 249 points this season. Only the Tennessee Titans (257), Dallas Cowboys (277) and Cincinnati Bengals (300) have given up more. Yes, they have sustained injuries, especially to their beleaguered secondary, but there isn't a team in the league that hasn't had to contend with injuries. Indeed, the 49ers were missing several key players, including Brock Purdy and Nick Bosa, yet still had their way with the Giants. Quite frankly, it was embarrassing to watch.

The one, lone bright spot in this train wreck of a season has been Jaxson Dart. The rookie has thrown for 1175 yards in six starts with 10 touchdowns and 3 interceptions. His QBR of 61.2 is 14th among starting quarterbacks; five points higher than Drake Maye's was in his rookie season, and eight points higher than Eli Manning's was in 2007, the year he won his first Super Bowl. In fact, Dart's QBR is higher than Bo Nix, Michael Penix, Jr, Jayden Daniels and Caleb Williams; the latter the number one pick in the 2024 NFL Draft.

Ever since the retirement of Eli, the Jints have been looking for someone to take over the reigns. Daniel Jones was supposed to be that guy; and for two seasons - his rookie and 2022 - it certainly looked that way. But, alas, it wasn't to be. Danny Dimes is now on the Indianapolis Colts where he is having his best year as a pro. Good for him.

As for Dart, it's obvious that the Giants have found their franchise quarterback. His resilience is matched only by his exuberance. If spunk was measured in dollars, Dart would be the richest rookie in the NFL. The kid is unflappable. But there's a limit to any man's resolve. John Mara is playing with fire if he thinks that this level of incompetence won't eventually get to the best quarterback this organization has drafted in its history. I'm not being facetious here. Phil Simms took five years to become a good quarterback; Eli didn't come into his own until his third full season; Dart is already there, and with inarguably the worst receiving corps in the league. 

But past performance is no guarantee of future success. Sam Darnold and Justin Fields were highly touted prospects out of college who were both badly screwed up by their respective teams. Darnold eventually resurrected his career in Minnesota and now Seattle, but Fields appears to be a lost cause. Ironically he's with the Jets, the team that drafted Darnold. You can't make this shit up.

Mara has an obligation to make sure history doesn't repeat itself. Even he decides to retain Joe Schoen as his GM, the entire coaching staff must go, starting with Defensive Coordinator Shane Bowen. His play calling is directly responsible for two losses this season. And Brian Daboll's reluctance - i.e, refusal - to criticize his assistant, is an indictment of him as a head coach. After the Denver loss, you could tell he lost the locker room. At this point, most of the players are just going through the motions. The lone exceptions are Dart and Brian Burns, who is having a career year. He currently leads the NFL with 11 sacks. 

The argument for keeping Daboll is based on the premise that with a young quarterback, continuity is essential. After all, Daniel Jones had four different offensive coordinators in his tenure as a Giant. No doubt that stunted his development. It's perfectly reasonable not to want to do that to Dart.

But the counter argument is that it's far worse for a young quarterback to be saddled in a system that, no matter what you do, keeps spinning its wheels. Even the most incurable optimist would have a hard time winning under those conditions.

If you want proof, look no further than Drake Maye. In his rookie season with the New England Patriots, his head coach was Jerod Mayo and his offensive coordinator was Alex Van Pelt. The Pats went 4-13 and Robert Kraft cleaned house. He hired Mike Vrabel as his head coach and Vrabel hired Josh McDaniels as his OC. The result is that Maye is fifth in the NFL with a QBR of 74, and New England is in first place in the AFC East with a record of 7-2.

Daboll's claim to fame, and the thing that made him attractive to Schoen, was that he helped Josh Allen become the player he is, but that doesn't mean he's a quarterback whisperer, or for that matter even a good head coach. The fact is that after a surprising 9-7-1 maiden season under Daboll, the Giants have been one of the worst run teams in the NFL since. I find it hard to believe they couldn't find someone considerably better to manage the sidelines, while also developing Dart.

Walking and chewing gum at the same time is something millions of people do every day. It's about time the Giants learned how to do it.

Jaxson Dart deserves no less.

Is It Possible That Maybe the Rangers Just Aren't That Good?

"I do think they will make the postseason; they have too much talent not to."

- Peter W. Fegan

Some days I thank my lucky stars that I don't put my money where my mouth is. I'd be living in my car right now, or under it. Look, I realize it's still early; after all, the 2013-14 Rangers got off to a 3-7-0 start under Alain Vigneault and they not only made the playoffs, they went all the way to the Stanley Cup finals. This core is only one year removed from winning the Presidents' Trophy; certainly there's plenty of time to turn this ship around.

God, I wish that were so, I really do. But if we're being honest with ourselves, the only thing that Rangers team has in common with this one is the logo on their jerseys. This team looks old and slow. With the exception of two road games against the Pittsburgh Penguins and the Montreal Canadiens and two home games against the Washington Capitals and the Edmonton Oilers, they have been outplayed in all the other games. FYI, they lost both those home games. Think about it: they're 2-2 against teams they outplayed, and 1-3-2 against teams that outplayed them.

The top six has looked more like a bottom six. Artemi Panarin is tied with Adam Fox for the team lead in scoring with seven points, and four of those points came against the Canadiens; Mika Zibanjead has three goals, and is on track to finish the season with 50 points; the "Captain" J.T. Miller has two goals and six points; and Alexis Lafreniere hasn't scored since October 9. There are kids on milk container cartons that are more conspicuous. At times this season, the bottom six has performed better than their top six counter parts. Exhibit A: perennial fourth liner Taylor Raddysh leads the team with four goals. 

The Rangers are the second worst scoring team in the NHL this season. Last night, they gave up five goals to a Calgary Flames team that had scored even fewer. And that was two nights after they lost 6-5 in overtime to the previously winless San Jose Sharks. Think about it: against two of the worst teams in the league, the best the Blueshirts could muster was one point. Just imagine what's going to happen when they start playing the elite teams. If the season ended today, not only would the Rangers not qualify for the playoffs, they'd be in excellent position to win the draft lottery. 

It's time to admit a painful truth: this team may not be as talented as I and others like me thought they were. Even with a healthy Vincent Trocheck - who, by-the-way, still hasn't resumed skating and is likely out until late November - this roster doesn't exactly scare the pants off you. From the 2021-22 season through the 2023-24 season, the Rangers power play was fourth in the NHL at 25.3 percent. Not coincidentally, they posted records of 52-24-6, 47-22-13 and 55-23-4. But last season, that vaunted power play plummeted to a paltry 17.6 percent, (21st) and as a result, the Rangers finished 39-36-7 and missed the playoffs.

This season, the power play has gotten off to an even worse start. After last night's game in Calgary, it's 19th in the league at 16 percent. For a team that struggles as much as the Rangers do at even strength, that simply isn't going to cut it. Let's face it: for three straight seasons, under two different coaches, the formula was pretty simple: score on the power play and let Igor Shesterkin do the rest. If either one didn't come through, the result was typically a loss. And that is precisely what we've been seeing the last two seasons: a flawed team that relied way too much on its power play and its goaltending to win, and is now sowing what it reaped.

So what happened? How did a team that went through a four-year rebuild end up with a three-year window? It's complicated. 

Let's go all the way back to that memo then G.M. Jeff Gorton sent out in the winter of 2018 informing the fanbase that he was going to break up the core and start a rebuild. Over the next twelve months, the Rangers traded Rick Nash, Michael Grabner, Ryan McDonagh, Miller and fan favorite Mats Zuccarello. As a result, they missed the playoffs two straight seasons. 

But while Gorton may have cleaned house, he did not strip it down to the studs, so to speak. He left enough talent in place for the team to be competitive. That spring, the Rangers wound up with the second overall pick in the Amateur Draft and selected Kaapo Kakko. The New Jersey Devils, with the first overall pick, chose Jack Hughes. The consensus at the time was that Kakko was a can't miss prospect who had the potential to be an elite winger in the NHL.

Then in the summer of 2019, Gorton short-circuited his own rebuild by trading for Jacob Trouba and signing Panarin to a seven-year contract worth $11.6 million per. While the Rangers record improved enough to qualify for the play-in round against the Carolina Hurricanes, they were none-the-less swept in three games. It wasn't a total loss, though; the Rangers wound up with the number one pick in the 2020 Amateur Draft, which they then used to select Lafreniere.

I'll say it again: both Kakko and Lafteniere were considered legitimate picks at the time they were taken, especially Lafreniere, who all the scouts agreed was the best player on the board. That neither has blossomed into the elite forwards they were projected to become, does not change anything. When you have the number one pick, you take the number one prospect. 

But even with two promising young wingers and Panarin, the Rangers still missed the playoffs. Owner James Dolan was growing impatient with the rebuild and after the Tom Wilson incident at the Garden, he lost it. In what can only be described as the most bizarre moment in Rangers history, he fired Gorton and Team President John Davidson.

Enter Chris Drury. Dolan gave the new President and GM two marching orders: 1. Make the playoffs; 2. Make sure the Wilson incident was never repeated. Drury fired David Quinn and replaced him with Gerard Gallant. He then traded Pavel Buchnevich for Sammy Blais and used the remaining cap savings to sign Ryan Reaves and Barclay Goodrow. Under Gallant, New York had its best season since 2015. With Reaves and Goodrow, the Rangers were no longer easy pushovers. They not only made the playoffs, they advanced all the way to the Eastern Conference finals before losing to the Tampa Bay Lightning in six. 

Despite the loss, the season was considered a glowing success. Zibanjad, Panarin, Fox and Chris Kreider all had career years. Shesterkin established himself as an elite goalie. The Kid Line of Kakko, Lafreniere and Filip Chytil, whom Gorton had drafted in 2018, was growing up in front of our eyes. The future certainly looked bright for the Blueshirts.

But when the 2022-23 season didn't get off to a good start, doubts about the core began to creep in. Trouba, who had been named captain before the start of the season, threw his helmet and screamed at his teammates. Drury grew frustrated at the inconsistencies he saw on the ice, and went whole hog at the trade deadline, acquiring both Vladimir Tarasenko and Patrick Kane. The Rangers went into the playoffs with arguably their most talented roster since the 1991-92 team. It didn't matter. After going up 2-0 against the Devils, New Jersey won four of the next five games to eliminate New York.

Drury pinned the blame for the collapse on Gallant and replaced him with Peter Laviolette. And just like they had done in Gallant's first year behind the bench, the Rangers not only had a great season under Laviolette, they won the Presidents' trophy for the first time since 2015. Once more, they advanced to the conference finals where they lost to the eventual Stanley Cup champion Florida Panthers. It was a bitter end to an otherwise excellent season, but this time around, Drury saw something that didn't quite sit well with him.

Despite their record, the Rangers were still a middling team at even strength. Too many of their wins were owed to their special teams and goaltending. The Panthers didn't just beat them, they schooled them. To his credit, Drury took notes. That summer, needing cap space, he waived Goodrow and attempted to trade Trouba. The former complained; the latter balked. The offseason maneuvering did not sit well with the players. Despite getting off to a 12-4-1 start, Drury still didn't like what he was seeing. He sent a letter to every GM in the league indicating he was open for business. Both Trouba and Kreider were mentioned in the letter. Trouba eventually cried uncle and accepted a trade, while Kreider, who was already having an off year, sulked along with his BFF Zibanejad. Kreider would eventually be traded this summer while Zibanejad reiterated he had no intention of going anywhere. The only good thing to come out of that hellish nightmare of a season was Drury reacquiring Miller for Chytil, who despite his enormous potential, could never stay healthy.

Once more Drury changed coaches. Mike Sullivan replaced Laviolette behind the bench. The hope was that Sully would be able to motivate this team, but that hasn't happened. The same issues continue to plague them: an inability to generate offense at 5v5; over-passing in the offensive zone, poor puck management in the defensive zone; an ineffective and predictable power play. When Igor isn't standing on his head, this team looks absolutely pathetic. 

So here we stand: a Rangers team that, on paper at least, should be better than its record indicates. Despite an average age of 28, most of the core is over 30, with Panarin leading the way at 34. And while Panarin will be a UFA next summer, Zibanejad, Trocheck and Fox are signed for the next several years to contracts that have either no movement or no trade clauses. That means Drury is as stuck with them as we are.

I honestly don't know where we go from here. What I can tell you is this: the Devils are a good, young team with a much more promising future than the Rangers, and at UBS Arena, the Islanders, thanks to winning the draft lottery, have the best young defenseman to lace up a pair of skates since Cale Makar. 

I'm old enough to remember the mid-1970s when the Rangers couldn't get out of their own way and a GM by the name of Bill Torrey assembled a team on Long Island that would go on to win four consecutive Cups.

I would not be in the slightest bit shocked if history ended up repeating itself. 

Knicks Get Off to a Good Start

To quote Monty Python, "And now for something completely different." 

The New York Knicks got the 2025-26 season off to a good start by beating the Cleveland Cavaliers 119-111 at the Garden. But it was how they beat them that was the story. Eschewing the half-court offense of their former coach Tom Thibodeau, the Knicks employed an uptempo game, distributing the ball equally around the court leading to many open shots. It was a refreshing sight to behold.

True to his word, new head coach Mike Brown went with a deep rotation, By the end of the first half, eleven players had entered the game. The only time that many players saw action under Thibs was when the Knicks were ahead by 20 with a minute to go. The bench, which had been much maligned last season, had 20 points by halftime to help New York build a 65-50 lead. In all, they finished with 35 for the game. Apart from OG Anunoby, not one starter logged more than 34 minutes.

Of course, the men in orange and blue just couldn't resist a trip down memory lane. They reverted back to their old ways in the third quarter and the result was predictable. The Cavs outscored them 37-22 to tie the game at 87. Donavan Mitchell had 21 of his game-high 31 points in the quarter. But then New York snapped out of it and went on a 14-2 run to start the fourth quarter. 

The Knicks got balanced scoring from their players. Anunoby led the way with 24 points, 14 rebounds and three steals; Jalen Brunson was next with 23 points and five assists; Karl-Anthony Towns contributed 19 points and 11 rebounds; Mikal Bridges chipped in with 16, 12 in the first half; and Deuce McBride had 15 points off the bench and was a game-best plus 17. Indeed, every Knick was a plus for the game, except Landry Shamet and Ariel Hukporti.

The Knicks out-rebounded the Cavs 48-32 overall, including 39-28 on the defensive boards, and scored 42 points in the paint. They also shot 86.1 percent front the free throw line, compared to 66.7 percent for Cleveland. For a team that went a combined 0-10 against the Cavs, Boston Celtics and Oklahoma City Thunder last season, last night's win was a statement game. This year's Knicks team is not last year's.

Of course, Brown was quick to put the win in perspective. "Pretty good effort from our team. The great part of it is we got a lot of room to grow, and that's what's exciting." Translation: let's hold off on the parade down the Canyon of Heroes.

That being said, it's clear that this team - even without Mitchell Robinson and Josh Hart in the lineup - is pretty deep and talented. If they're this good in their first regular season game, imagine how good they're going to be in game 10 or 20?

What impresses me most about Brown is that he isn't afraid to utilize his bench in crucial situations during the game. At one point he had Tyler Kolek, Jordan Clarkson, Guerschon Yabusele and Hukporti on the court at the same time. Can you imagine Thibs doing that? Again, this is not about hating on the former Knicks coach; it's about having enough faith in your players. 

Game one is in the books; game two is Friday in Boston. 

2025-26 Knicks Preview

The last time the New York Knicks entered an NBA season with this much anticipation, Pat Riley was the head coach and Patrick Ewing was the center.  Over the last thirty years, there have been a lot of ups and downs with this organization - mostly downs - but one thing has remained constant: the love and devotion of a fanbase that, since 1973, has waited patiently for a chance to celebrate another title. 

Well their wait could finally be coming to an end. I say "could" because, as New York sports fan will tell you, getting your hopes up is a sure-fire recipe for disappointment. Lest we forget, the Giants, Jets, Mets and Rangers play in this town. The Giants have made the playoffs twice in 14 years; the Jets haven't won a Super Bowl since 1969; the Mets haven't won a World Series since 1986; and the Rangers have won one Stanley Cup since World War II. If you looked up the word Disappointment in the dictionary, there'd be an arial view of the five boroughs next to it.

But at the risk of sounding pollyanna, I'm bullish on the 2025-26 Knicks, and not just because they may be the only team worth watching in about a month. It's because I believe Leon Rose has assembled a roster that is not only talented but deep. Indeed, this may be the deepest bench the Knicks have had in decades. And despite the Debbie Downers, Mike Brown is the perfect coach for this team. I was never a Tom Thibodeau hater, it's just that driving your starters into the ground, as Thibs often did, didn't seem to make much sense for a team with championship aspirations.

So what should we expect?

Well for starters, if Brown is able to implement his system successfully, the Knicks will be a lot more exciting to watch. The half-court offense that Thibs employed is out. Look for this team to move the ball quickly up court. I'm not saying they're going to be the OKC Thunder, but the days of waiting until there are seven seconds left on the shot clock to set up a play are gone.

The biggest beneficiary of Brown's system will be Jalen Brunson. If I had a dollar for every time the captain would dribble the ball across the time line only to be met by a double team, I could buy a court-side seat at the Garden for a month. It was excruciating watching Brunson set up the offense in that system. In Brown's system that won't be the case. In fact, Brown doesn't believe in calling out plays; he wants his team to read the defense and react accordingly.

While that might be easier said than done, it's worth noting that a system which relies more on reaction than established plays is less predictable, hence harder to defend. If Brunson is going to lead this team to a championship he can't constantly bear the brunt of one double team after another. This isn't the '70s anymore. In today's NBA if you don't have an effective transition game, you're not going to go far in the playoffs. The Indiana Pacers exposed a fatal flaw in the Knicks game, and Rose rectified it by changing coaches.

Another beneficiary of Brown's system should be Mikal Bridges. The player Rose sent five first-round draft picks to the Brooklyn Nets for is considered one of the best defensive wings in the league, and yet there were times last season when he seemed lost in the shuffle. I fully expect Brown to utilize him more. If you want to know how effective Bridges can be, take a good look at what he did in his first year as a Net. In 27 games, he averaged 26.1 points as the two, where he is expected to play this season alongside Brunson. And with Bridges at the two, and Karl-Anthony Towns at the four, O.G. Anunoby can move back to the three where he is a much better fit. If Mitchell Robinson can stay healthy, this should be the best starting five the Knicks have had since the mid '90s.

The bench will play a critical role for the Knicks this season. Unlike Thibs, who rarely utilized more than six or seven players, Brown will employ a full ten-man rotation. Jordan Clarkson and Guerschon Yabusele are versatile additions to this roster. Clarkson will play the one or the two, while Yabusele will replace Precious Achiuwa at the four or the five. Both should get plenty of minutes, along with Josh Hart and Deuce McBride. I wouldn't be at all surprised if McBride has his best season as a Knick under Brown. Tyler Kolek, Landry Shamet and Ariel Hukporti will round out the reserves.

Chemistry should not be an issue. Unlike last season, when Bridges and KAT were the new kids on the block, this core is pretty much set. If there is any acclimation period, it'll be to Brown's system. I would give it 10 to 15 games for everyone to get up to speed.

With Jayson Tatum and Tyrese Haliburton both lost for the season, neither the Boston Celtics nor the Indiana Pacers will be much of a threat. That leaves the Cleveland Cavaliers as the only other legitimate contender in the Eastern Conference. Providence has apparently intervened in New York's favor. The only thing standing in the way of the Knicks making it to the finals for the first time since 1999 will be the Knicks themselves.

So, bottom line, where will they finish? Last season, the Knicks finished third in the East with a record of 51-31. Assuming Rose isn't pressured into doing something stupid like trading for Giannis, I expect this team to finish first in the conference with a record of 58-24. Can they go all the way? That depends on who they face in the finals, but yes.

As I've done the last two years, below are my predictions for the top teams in each conference, as well as who will make it to the conference finals and who will win it all. I'm sure I don't have to remind anyone not to take them seriously.

Eastern Conference:

Knicks

Cavs

Magic

Pistons

Celtics

Pacers

Hawks

Bucks

Heat

Bulls

Western Conference:

Thunder

Nuggets

Mavericks

Rockets

Timberwolves

Warriors

Lakers

Kings

Grizzlies

Spurs

Eastern Conference finals:

Knicks over Cavs 4-3

Western Conference finals:

Nuggets over Mavericks 4-2

NBA Finals:

Knicks over Nuggets 4-3

Mile Low City

Some losses are inevitable, others are preventable, and still others are reprehensible. Guess which one this was?

Through three quarters at Mile High Stadium, the New York Giants played the prefect road game. They led the Denver Broncos 19-0. Their defense had limited the Broncos to just 111 total yards of offense. While on the other side of the ball, Jaxson Dart threw two touchdown passes; the first one to a wide open Daniel Bellinger. It was the first touchdown Denver had allowed in the first quarter this season. All Big Blue had to do to secure a win was to continue to play aggressive on defense and move the ball on offense.

When Theo Johnson caught a deflected pass by Dart for a touchdown with 10:14 left in the fourth quarter to put New York up 26-8, it certainly looked to all the world that they were going to do just that. I mean, who blows an 18 point lead with 10 minutes to go, right? Even Broncos fans knew it was over; many of them started leaving the stadium at that point. They missed one helluva comeback.

Denver would score touchdowns on their next three possessions, one aided by a Dart interception, to take a four-point lead with 1:51 remaining in the game. To his credit, Dart led his team down the field and, thanks to a pass interference penalty on the Broncos near the gaol line, took it into the end zone to regain the lead for his team.

With 33 seconds left and New York ahead 32-30, the Broncos, with no timeouts left, took the ball all the way down to Giants 21 yard line, where Wil Lutz kicked a game-wining 39 yard field goal. The reason it was a game-winning and not a game-tying field goal is because Jude McAtamney missed the extra point on the Giants last touchdown drive that would've put them up by three. Then again, if McAtamney hadn't missed an earlier extra point, the Broncos would've needed a touchdown to win the game. In all, Denver scored 33 points in the fourth quarter, the most ever by a team that had been held scoreless through three. 

You can always tell when a team is in trouble: they start watching the clock instead of managing the game. The Giants, not wanting to lose, went into a shell; the Broncos, with nothing to lose, pulled out all the stops. I've watched Sean Payton teams over the years. Regardless of what the score is, there's a tenacity to them. They can be ahead by ten, they can be trailing by twenty, you'd never know it by the level of play on the field. He may have only one Super Bowl win to his credit, but he is a Hall of Fame coach, and his players all know what's expected of them.

Brian Daboll is no Sean Payton, that should be obvious. But as bad as Daboll has been over the last three seasons, his defensive coordinator Shane Bowen deserves the lions share of the blame for this latest abomination. His decision to rush only three on the Broncos last scoring drive was inexcusable. This is the second time this season that the Giants have lost a game in which they led with less than 40 seconds remaining in regulation. The first was against the Cowboys in Dallas in week two. New York lost that game in OT, 40-37.

As painful as that loss was, though, it pales in comparison to this one. According to Adam Schefter, since the 1970 merger between the NFL and AFL, only two teams have overcome a fourth-quarter deficit of 19 points or more to win a regular-season game: the Indianapolis Colts against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in 2003 (21 points) and the Broncos against the Giants yesterday.

I can't imagine what the players must be going through. For three quarters they played their hearts out. They were minutes away from what would've been back-to-back wins against playoff teams. Jaxson Dart went 15/33 for 283 yards, with three touchdowns through the air and one on the ground. Brian Burns had another dominating performance on defense, recording two sacks and two quarterback hits. He was visibly upset after the game, and deservedly so.

Yes, I know the old cliche that good teams find a way to win and bad teams find a way to lose, but it's not that simple with this team. The Giants are not the Jets, or the Miami Dolphins, or the Tennessee Titans. There is talent on this roster, more talent than their record would indicate. They should be 4-3 and in the thick of the playoff race; instead they're 2-5, and facing the very real prospect of going 2-6 after they lose to the Philadelphia Eagles next Sunday.

This was no self-inflicted wound, like we saw in New Orleans against the Saints; this shot came from the sidelines. Even if Daboll fires Bowen tomorrow, the damage has already been done. How do you recover from a loss like this?

The season is all but done, and once more, Giants fans will have to wait until next year to raise a banner of hope.

Record Setting

First, the good news: So far this season, Igor Shesterkin has stopped 103 of 106 shots on goal. His backup, Jonathan Quick, has stopped 20 of 21 shots on goal. Together, the pair have a combined save percentage of .969, by far the best in the league. More good news, over their last three games, the New York Rangers have thoroughly outplayed their opponents, out-chancing them 95-56; and 29-12 in high danger chances.

Now for the bad news: Despite all that, the Rangers are 2-3-0 under Mike Sullivan. As if that weren't bad enough, they are the first team in the 107 year history of the NHL to be shut out in their first three home games. Now that's what I call record setting.

In the five and half decades I've been following this team, I thought I'd seen it all. Injuries to key players, fluke goals, bad giveaways, bad luck, no luck at all. But I never saw this coming. Then again I never saw the Mets collapse either. And to add insult to injury, Chris Kreider, who Chris Drury traded over the summer, has scored four goals in three games for the Anaheim Ducks. The Monday morning quarterbacks are already in mid-season form.

There are two ways of looking at this. 1. The Rangers have been victimized by some pretty damn good goaltending, which for them is a switch since usually it's the other way around; 2. They lack the firepower to finish in the offensive zone.

If I had to guess, I'd say it's a little bit of both. Let's be honest, after being the beneficiaries of Igor's heists over the last few years, it was inevitable that the pendulum might swing back, if only for a while. The hockey gods do have a sense of humor, you know. But with Vincent Trocheck on LTIR and Artemi Panarin clearly not himself after sustaining a pre-season injury, that's hardly the 1985 Edmonton Oilers out there.

It's telling that the Rangers leading goal scorer is Adam Fox with three. No one else has more than one. Last night against the Oilers, the best line on the ice for the Blueshirts was Sam Carrick centering Adam Edstrom and Matt Rempe. They combined for three of New York's ten high-danger scoring chances. 

For this team to have any chance of making the playoffs, let alone advancing, they are going to need their top six to produce. And by produce, I mean more than four goals. Mika Zibanjead leads the league in shots on goal with 22, which is nice to see, but he has found the back of the net only once. That isn't going to cut it. Until Trocheck returns, he has to take up the slack.

And while Panarin gets back to his old self, the spotlight is on Alexis Lafreniere. This is his sixth year in the NHL and the former overall number one draft pick still has yet to deliver on his promise. Aside from the game against the Sabres in Buffalo, he has been virtually invisible so far this season. It's time for him to shit or get off the pot.

Look, I'm not going to panic. J.T. Miller has a point when he told reporters after the game, "Let’s not make this bigger than it is. It’s game five. A lot to like about our game. It’s a unique situation, but let’s not blow this out of proportion here." However, if they're still having trouble scoring after twenty games, I'd start worrying.

For now, as an old manager of mine used to say, "It is what it is." The Rangers have played five games this season; they've lost three of them. Not the start they wanted, but it's still early.