Showing posts with label wildcard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wildcard. Show all posts

Thursday, October 6, 2022

Buck is Playing with Fire



In theory, the strategy makes sense. You start your best pitcher against the Padres in game one of the wildcard round. Then, assuming he wins, you start your third best pitcher in the clincher. And if everything goes according to plan, your second best pitcher is available to start game one of the NLDS against the Dodgers.

Sounds perfect. What good possibly go wrong?

Well, for starters, let's say Max Scherzer out duels Yu Darvish. So far, so good. Buck Showalter hands the ball to Christ Bassitt in game two, who pitches well, but not well enough to win. Now, Buck has to rely on Jacob deGrom in game three to save the season, and quite possibly his job. 

Regardless of what happens, the grand strategy is out the window. If Jake throws a gem, Buck has to decide whether to go with Carlos Carrasco or Taijuan Walker as his game one starter in the NLDS. Either way, the Dodgers go up 1-0. But if Jakes loses, Buck will spend the entire off season trying to justify why he elected not to go with his two best pitchers in the first playoff series this franchise has appeared in since 2015.

I cannot emphasize enough just how critical it is for this team, after blowing the division to the Braves in the final days of the season, to win at least one playoff series. To go out in the first round is simply a non-starter. If the Mets go on and lose to the Dodgers, the fans will be disappointed, but they'll live. After all, the Dodgers are the best team in the majors. They're suppose to win. But if the Mets lose to a team like the Padres, the fans will be outraged, and rightfully so.

Look, the goal of every professional sports team is to win championships, I get it. And owner Steve Cohen has made it abundantly clear he's willing to spend whatever it takes to accomplish that goal. He's already invested $279 million in salaries this year and will likely spend another $20 to $30 million next year. That is music to the ears of a fanbase that for far too long has seen its team play second fiddle to the Yankees.

But, let's be honest for a moment. As good as the Mets have been this season - and winning 101 games is not too shabby - it does have flaws; and some of those flaws were revealed in Atlanta last weekend. Only an incurable optimist would believe this team is capable of winning a World Series.

But the Padres are not the Braves. The Mets should beat them. They're the better team. While the pitching staffs may be comparable, the Mets have a deeper lineup and Edwin Diaz in their bullpen. If they lose because Buck was caught looking too far ahead, it will be the worst decision by a Mets manager since Davey Johnson decided to leave Doc Golden in to face Mike Scioscia in the top of the 9th in game four of 1988 NLCS. We all know what happened. Scioscia's two-run homer tied the score, and the Dodgers went on to win the game, the pennant and the World Series.

Buck Showalter is playing with fire, and if he doesn't knock it off, the whole season could go up in smoke.

Wednesday, August 3, 2022

Did the Mets Just Blow the NL East?


Are the Mets a better team today than they were before the trade deadline? Yes.

Are they as good as they could've been? Unfortunately no.

For the record, the moves Billy Eppler made were all solid pickups. J.D. Davis for Darin Ruf was a no-brainer. Davis has looked lost at the plate all season, while Ruf has been solid against lefties. He will platoon at DH with fellow trade acquisition Daniel Vogelbach, who has a pretty good average against righties. The addition of Mychal Givens to a beleaguered bullpen will come in handy in the dog days of August and September. And Tyler Naquin will provide much needed depth in the outfield. Gone are the days when Dominic Smith (.194) and Travis Jankowski (.164) were the only options available to Buck Showalter off the bench.

But here's the painful truth: Eppler failed to acquire the big bat this team desperately needs. Face it, once you get passed Starling Marte (.300, 11 HRs, 47 RBIs), Francisco Lindor (.261, 19 HRs, 74 RBIs) and Pete Alonso (.276, 27 HRs, 86 RBIs), there isn't one hitter in this lineup who puts the fear of God into an opposing pitcher. Mark Canha is a nice enough player with modest power; Jeff McNeil hits for a higher average but has even less power; and the Ruf / Vogelbach platoon is adequate at best. Luis Guillorme can't hit lefties and Eduardo Escobar can't hit righties. And whoever Showalter puts behind the plate is as close to an automatic out as there is in baseball. 

Look, I get it. The Mets weren't going to gut their farm system just to land Juan Soto. And even if they had been willing, no way the Nationals were going to trade him to a division rival. It's bad enough they have to see Max Scherzer staring back at them from the Mets dugout nineteen times during the season. Imagine the torment Soto could inflict upon them for the next decade and a half.

But even if Soto was nothing more than a pipe dream, it's hard to imagine Eppler couldn't have found someone better than Ruf, Vogelbach or Naquin out there. The Cubs were looking to move both Willson Contreras and Ian Happ. Contreras is a catcher who has 14 homers on the season, and when he's not behind the plate can easily DH, while Happ is a switch-hitter who can play both left field and third base. Who would you rather see batting behind Alonso? Contreras or a platoon of Ruf and Vogelbach?

I know it takes two to tango, and given that the Cubs were unable to find a trade partner for either Contreras or Happ, we can assume that their demands were too high. But for a fanbase that's grown accustomed to the Mets playing second fiddle in this town, it would've been nice to see them go all in, even if Eppler had to overpay. The 64 wins they had going into August represented the most wins the franchise has had at this point in the season since that magical year of 1986. It would be nothing short of gross negligence if this opportunity is wasted.

With the return of Jake deGrom, the Mets have arguably the best starting rotation in all of baseball. But after Edwin Diaz and Adam Ottavino, their bullpen is still too thin. And their lineup, with the exception of the aforementioned Marte, Lindor and Alonso, isn't nearly as potent as the Braves, Dodgers or Padres, who after acquiring Soto, Josh Bell and Brandon Drury are now a legit threat to win the World Series.

Are they good enough to make the postseason? Probably. But their odds of winning the division and avoiding the wildcard round took a serious hit this week.



Sunday, September 8, 2013

Who Will Win Super Bowl 48?

Let's get something straight. If I really knew who was going to win the big game in February, I wouldn't be writing this silly blog; I'd be in Vegas planning my next villa in the south of France. But, if recent history is any indication, the winner will most definitely NOT be the number one seed in its conference.

Going back to the 2005 season, only two Super Bowl winners earned a first-round bye. They were the '08 Steelers (#2 seed) and the '09 Saints (#1 seed). The other SB winners were either low-seed division or wildcard teams. The '06 Colts, '11 Giants and '12 Ravens were low-seed winners while the '05 Steelers, '07 Giants and '10 Packers were wildcard winners. That's six out of eight winners that were not even favored to get to the conference championship game, much less the Super Bowl.

What that tells you is that in today's NFL, anything goes. Parody is the key to what drives the sport. It's what makes things so interesting and predictions so hard to make. In fact you could say the only predictable thing about the NFL is its unpredictability.

So, with that in mind, let me go on record as saying who ever wins Super Bowl 48, will NOT be the top seed in its conference. That means no Denver Broncos and Houston Texans (my picks for #1 and #2 seeds respectively in the AFC) or San Francisco 49ers and Atlanta Falcons (#1 and #2 seeds in the NFC).

The likely teams to represent the AFC are: The Indianapolis Colts and Baltimore Ravens (again). In the NFC, I like the Green Bay Packers, Seattle Seahawks and New York Giants.  Since the big game is being played in New York, I'll go with the Giants over Ravens at Met Life Stadium.

Don't bet the ranch.  Remember, I'm a Mets' fan.