The Better Team Wins

You know how you can tell which is the better team? It wins, that's how. Trust me, I have a lot of experience rooting for teams that have lost to better ones.

In 1973, the Mets lost to the A's in the World Series. Both teams were good; the A's were better.

In 1994, the Knicks lost to the Rockets in the NBA finals. Both team were good; the Rockets were better. 

In 2001, the Giants lost to the Ravens in Super Bowl 35. Both teams were good; the Ravens were better.

In 2014, the Rangers lost to the Kings in the Stanley Cup finals. Both teams were good; the Kings were better.

In 2015, the Mets lost to the Royals in the World Series. Again both teams were good; the Royals were better.

So far in the 2026 NBA finals, a lot of people have tied themselves up in knots coming up with reasons for why the Knicks couldn't possibly be the better team in this series. They point out that over the first four games, the Spurs have led for a total of 133 minutes while the Knicks have led for only 52 minutes, ergo the Spurs are better. Such a stat is about as useless as time of possession is in football. Many a team has won the time of possession while losing the game. It happens more than you think. Last time I checked, the only score that mattered was the final score.

Look, have the Spurs gotten off to good starts in these finals? Most definitely, yes. San Antonio has led at the end of all four first quarters. In fact, they've held double-digit leads in every game of this series. But as good as they've been in the first quarter, the Knicks have been better in the other three. New York is a collective -47 in the first quarter, but in quarters two, three and four, they're +24, +16 and +15 respectively. The 29-point lead the Spurs blew in the second half of game four represents the largest blown lead ever in an NBA final. That singular distinction belongs to them, not the Knicks.

This postseason, the Knicks have played better on the road than they have at Madison Square Garden. They're +171 away vs +108 at home. All three closeout games have occurred in the visitors arena, not one has been remotely close. Clearly, living out of a suitcase has not been a problem for this team.

The Knicks have the best player in this final; the best clutch player in all of basketball. They might even have the second best player. That is not a knock on the Spurs; it's just a fact based on everything we've observed from watching both these teams in the closing minutes. With the exception of game three, the Knicks have been the more composed, more poised and more mature team on the court. Their best players have simply been better than the Spurs best players, and Mike Brown has out-coached his counterpart Mitch Johnson.

Ask yourself this question. Who would rather have when the game is on the line: Jalen Brunson, OG Anunoby and Karl-Anthony Towns or De'Aaron Fox, Julian Champagnie and Victor Wembanyama? That was meant as a rhetorical question, by the way. I wasn't looking for an answer.

I don't know why this is so hard for some people to comprehend. The Knicks are not leading 3-1 because they've been lucky or because they had an easy path to the finals or even because the basketball gods are finally smiling on them. They're leading because they've been the better team.

Is it possible that the Spurs can come back and win this series? Of course it is. And if they do, guess what? They will be the better team.  But I sincerely doubt that will happen. I think this series ends tonight with the better team hoisting the Larry O'Brien trophy.

That's how this works; it's how it's always worked. There are no participation trophies when it comes to sports. There are just winners and losers. The winners get to celebrate with their teammates on a podium and receive a ring; the losers get to go home empty handed. 

Sorry if that ruins your narrative, but then I've never been very good at drawing narratives. Besides, I'm a Rangers fan. Who knows more about losing to a better team than us?

History

"Little roller up along first. Behind the bag, it gets through Buckner. Here comes Knight and the Mets win it!"

- Vince Scully, bottom of the 10th, Game 6, 1986 World Series

I will never forget the range of emotions I felt during that 10th inning in October of '86. The Mets were one pitch away from losing the World Series and I and my friends were despondent. Minutes later, I went from despondent to elated. Mookie Wilson had saved the season. There would be a game seven at Shea Stadium, after all, and the Mets would win it.

To be clear, last night's game at Madison Square Garden was not an elimination game for the New York Knicks. Had they lost, the finals would've been tied at two with game five in San Antonio Saturday night. But the stakes were no less high. A loss would've given the Spurs home court with the prospects of this promising postseason ending up like all the others: in bitter frustration. 

And for the first 24 minutes it certainly looked that way. Unlike game three - which was close throughout - game four was turning into a rout. The Knicks seemed about as interested in playing a basketball game as I was taking calculus in college. Karl-Anthony Towns picked up two fouls in the first minute of play; the latter courtesy of a terrible call on a challenge by Spurs coach Mitch Johnson. Jalen Brunson resumed his ISO ball which resulted in his teammates standing around like statues. And the vaunted New York defense, which had come to define this playoff run, was nowhere to be seen. San Antonio led 41-22 after one and 76-49 at halftime. 

The Spurs shot 28-47 (59.6%) from the field and 14-26 (53.8%) from three in the first half, while the Knicks shot 15-37 (40.5%) and 4-12 (33.3%) respectively. The Spurs also had more assists than the Knicks: 18 to 7. The Garden resembled more a mausoleum than a sports arena. Spike Lee looked like he was going to jump off the Brooklyn Bridge.

But then in the second half New York finally woke up. They started playing defense and began to move the ball around. The Knicks had 16 assists in the half, as they outscored the Spurs 58-30 to win the game 107-106 and take a 3-1 series lead back to San Antonio.

The turning point came with 9:27 to go in the third quarter. The Spurs were up 81-52 when Victor Wembanyama was hit with a flagrant foul 1 for elbowing Towns. KAT converted both free throws and the Knicks never looked back. They narrowed the gap to 90-75 going into the fourth and took their first lead of the game with 1:22 left in regulation. The Garden, which had been quiet most of the night, erupted. Mariska Hargitay and Taylor Swift were dancing in the aisles. Larry David was actually caught smiling.

While Brunson had 17 points in the half - 36 for the game - it was OG Anunoby who was the main hero. His block on De'Aaron Fox's layup with 11 seconds to go and his rebound shot with 1.2 seconds left to put his team up for good is the reason New York is one win away from its first championship in 53 years. Anunoby is also one of only five players in NBA finals history to score 30 or more points and the go-ahead field goal in the last three seconds of the game. The other four are Jerry West (1962), Kareem Abdul Jabbar (1974), Hakeem Olajuwon (1995) and Michael Jordan (1997).

Another unsung hero was Jose Alvarado. Mike Brown elected to put him and Brunson together in the backcourt to start the fourth. Alvarado scored 8 points and 3 assists in the quarter. Together, the pair was a plus 21 in 12 minutes. It was a brilliant move by the Knicks coach.

This was the third time in this series that the Knicks successfully overcame a double-digit deficit to win a game. They trailed by 14 points in game one, 12 in game two and 29 in game four; the latter an NBA record for a finals game. The previous record was held by the Celtics who overcame a 24-point deficit against the Lakers in 2008.

After shooting the lights out in the first half, the Spurs went ice cold in the second. They were 8-39 (20.5%) in the field and 3-17 (17.6%) from three. While the Knicks D had a lot to do with that, San Antonio helped them out with their decision making with the ball. For some reason, the Spurs attempted eight consecutive three-pointers up by 20 to 25 points, converting on only one. On twelve separate possessions they shot the ball with more than 10 seconds remaining on the shot clock. This "strategy" was eerily similar to the one the Celtics employed last year against the Knicks. The result was consecutive blown leads in games one and two and an eventual series defeat.

The number one offender was Fox. He had four turnovers in the second half, one of which was a backcourt violation. His decision to go for a layup in the closing seconds with this team up by one rather than dribble it out and let the Knicks foul him was inexplicable. Seconds after Anunoby blocked his shot, he scored the winning bucket. The two things you must do when you have a big lead is to use the clock to your advantage and don't turn the ball over. The Spurs did neither and it gave the Knicks the opening they needed to eventually win the game.

So now the Knicks have a chance to close out this series and put the Spurs out of their misery. They have yet to play a full 48 minutes in any of these games. Indeed, you could make the case that had it not been for San Antonio's ineptitude, New York might very well be trailing 3-1 instead of leading 3-1. 

But that's water over the dam. Regardless of how they got here, the Knicks are one win away from winning their first championship since 1973. If they are smart they will take care of business Saturday night.

About the Officiating

Normally I don't like to talk about the officiating in games. While I don't have any data to support this, it's my belief that, with few exceptions, the officials don't impact the game. In the end, the players have more to say about the outcome than anyone wearing a striped shirt.

That being said, we need to talk about the officiating in this series. It's been terrible.

In game two, Tony Brothers clearly missed a foul committed by Julian Champagnie on an OG Aununoby three-point attempt. The original call was out of bounds and San Antonio ball. Mike Brown called a timeout to challenge the call. After reviewing the play, the call was reversed and Anunoby was awarded three foul shots, which he converted.

At the time the score was tied at 97 with 2:37 left in the fourth quarter. The Knicks won the game by a single point, 105-104. If Brown did not have a challenge available, the Knicks might very well have lost that game and would currently be trailing 2-1 in this best of seven series.

In game three, the Spurs had 10 more free throw attempts than the Knicks. In the second half alone, they were 20-24 from the free throw line compared to 6-8 for the Knicks. The primary reason for this discrepancy was that New York was in the penalty within the first four minutes of each quarter. Fouls that the refs were letting go in the first half, they started calling in the second. Players pretty much all agree that the thing they want most from the officials is consistency. If something isn't a foul in the first half, it shouldn't be a foul in the second. 

Speaking of the first half, the Knicks were rightly upset that Victor Wembanyama was not called for a foul when he threw Jalen Brunson to the court in the first quarter. The NBA reviewed the non-call the following day and determined that it did not rise to the level of a flagrant foul 1. What was so frustrating about the play is that it happened with the Knicks in possession. Landry Shamet, the ball handler, was literally standing five feet away from where the foul occurred. It is inconceivable that not one official saw what happened. Wemby was seen smirking almost immediately after the incident.

Mike Brown was also perturbed about the non-call. Borrowing a page out of Rick Carlisle's playbook, he used his postgame presser to let everyone know where he stood. It was an unusual move for Brown who typically focuses on how well his players execute on the court. Given the circumstances, one could hardly blame him. It was clear from the opening tip-off that the Spurs were trying to intimidate the Knicks. 

Look, I don't want to beat this like a dead horse, but these are the sorts of things that can leave a bad taste in fans mouths. It feeds a narrative that there are two kinds of rules in sports: one for the stars and one for everyone else. Don't believe me? Ask yourself this question: if Mitchell Robinson had thrown Stephon Castle to the court, what would've happened to him? I'll lay odds that he would've gotten a foul which would've been reviewed for a flagrant 1.

In the end, the Knicks did not lose game three because of lousy officiating; they lost it because, as I wrote in my previous piece, they reverted back to old habits. They can control that. What they can't control are the actions of the three men whose job it is to make sure that the rules are evenly enforced. Physical play is one thing; but intimidation like what we saw is another. 

I've been watching the NHL since the 1970s. I've seen all kinds of shit masquerading as hockey. The NBA went through a similar period in the late '80s and early '90s. Fortunately, it cleaned it up. The last thing any fan of the sport wants to see is a return to the "anything goes" days. After this series is over, Adam Silver would do well to meet with his people and set down some guidelines on how fouls are enforced. Either the rules apply to everyone or they apply to no one.

Some stars might squawk about it, but in the end, the integrity of the game is the only thing that matters.

Hold the Parade

"With the 5th pick in the 2026 NFL Draft, the New York Giants select Arvell Reese, linebacker, Ohio State."  - April 23, 2026.

It's hard to believe that the last time the New York Knicks lost a playoff game, John Harbaugh and Joe Schoen were high-fiving each other because the player they had at the top of their board fell into their laps at five. That was six and a half weeks ago.

God when you say it like that, it almost seems surreal.

Through the first half of game three, things were going pretty much according to script. The Spurs jumped out to an early double-digit lead, only to have the Knicks either close the gap or take the lead outright. At halftime, New York led 64-57, outscoring San Antonio 42-24 in the second quarter on 73.7 percent shooting. It was the most points ever scored by a Knicks team in a quarter in a finals game. The Garden faithful had visions of a four-game sweep; some, I suppose, were even planning where they would camp out on the parade route. 

But then the script flipped in the second half. The Spurs, aided by what seemed like an avalanche of calls in their favor, went to the free throw line 24 times to the Knicks 8. That discrepancy allowed them to regain the lead by the end of the third quarter; a lead they would never relinquish. The final score was 115-111. 

So much for a sweep. We now have a series on our hands; one in which the Knicks are still the favorites, but barely. 

So how did the Spurs end the Knicks 13 game win streak?

It wasn't so much what the Spurs did but what the Knicks didn't do. I wrote after game two that to win this series, New York was going to have to do three things: 1. Stop falling behind; 2. Get Jalen Brunson off the ball; and 3. Run the offense through Karl-Anthony Towns. They were 0-3.

It's one thing to know you're capable of coming from behind - and, let's face it, over the last two postseasons, the Knicks have become experts at it - it's quite another to a make a habit out of it. Teams that trail that much end up expending far too much energy chasing the game. As anyone who's ever watched a basketball or hockey game will tell you, it's easier to play with the lead than it is to play from behind. The Knicks have got to stop making it hard on themselves.

It was obvious from the start of the finals that San Antonio was going to target Brunson. That isn't James Harden out there. The Spurs guards know how to defend, and they've been on Brunson like white on rice. But rather than give up the ball, Captain Clutch has been forcing up difficult shots, many of which have not gone in. For the series, Brunson is 30-81 (37%). He's averaging 27 shots per game. According to StatMuse, the Knicks were 33-8 during the regular season when Brunson took 20 shots or fewer per game. By going ISO as much as he has, Brunson has unintentionally made his team easier to guard. It's no coincidence that the Knicks only had 18 assists in the game. During the regular season, they were 43-11 when they had 25 or more assists. The low assist total might account for why Mikal Bridges only had two points, his lowest point total since game three of the Atlanta series. 

Over the first two games, Towns played an integral role in the Knicks offense. So effective was he in distributing the ball and driving to the net that he was the front runner for finals MVP. Last night, he went 4-10 - 0-2 from three - for 11 points and had only 8 rebounds. Worse, he has not scored a single point in the fourth quarter in these finals. That is simply inexcusable. KAT owned Victor Wembanyama over the first two games. By not getting him the ball, Wemby went wild in game three, scoring a series high 32 points. The Knicks need to get back to what worked so well for them in the previous three rounds.

The good news? Even with the disparity on foul shots (84-61 in the series), the low assists total and Brunson's ball hogging, the Knicks lost by only four points. Overall, the shooting percentages of both teams were about equal. New York even had a slight edge in scoring in the paint and rebounds. In what was a must win for the Spurs, they hardly dominated.

The bad news? The Knicks may come away from this loss believing that all they have to do is tweak a few things and they'll be all right. That would be disastrous. What last night's loss revealed was that the Knicks have fallen back into some old habits; old habits that led to them trailing the Hawks 2-1 in the first round. They did not sweep the Sixers and the Cavs playing like this and they will most certainly not beat the Spurs playing this way. They need to snap out of it, and fast, or this series will be tied Wednesday night.

And if that happens, it is unlikely that the Spurs will lose three games in a row in their building. Meaning the Knicks could well be facing elimination in game six. If you think the mood at the Garden was sullen after last night's loss, just think what'll be like if the Knicks become the first team in NBA history to blow a finals after taking the first two games on the road.

That cannot be allowed to happen, and it won't happen as long as the proper adjustments are made. I said at the beginning of the series that the Knicks are the better team. I still believe that's true, but that presupposes that they play up to their potential. Apart from the second quarter, they did not do that last night. They must do it Wednesday night, and for a full 48 minutes.

There will be no excuses if they don't.

A Bakers Dozen

Admit it: When you saw Victor Wembanyama take that shot with 2 seconds left you had flashbacks of Tyrese Haliburton's game-tying shot from last year's Eastern Conference finals. Being a Knicks fan means learning how to deal with PTSD. It doesn't take much to ruin our day or night. And just so we're clear, even with Mitchell Robinson guarding him, Wemby probably makes that shot 9 out of 10 times. 

But there's something different about these Knicks. After blowing a 97-83 lead with 6:04 remaining in the fourth quarter, and trailing 104-102 with 57 seconds left, they found a way to win. Jalen Brunson, the hero of game one, once again came to the rescue. He scored the game's final three points, the last one a free throw after he stole a bad pass from Wemby and was fouled with 9.5 seconds to go. 

The Knicks have now won 13 playoff games in a row; two shy of the record set by the Golden State Warriors in 2017. They are, as Brian Windhorst said after the game, "a freakin' winning machine." I've heard of resiliency, but this is ridiculous.

Despite the final score, though, this was a game in which the Knicks pretty much dominated from the second quarter on. After trailing 34-25 at the end of the first quarter, New York took a 56-52 lead into the locker room at half time. They expanded that lead to 84-75 after three. And they were cruising to yet another double-digit road win before the Spurs went on their run.

But while Brunson may have dragged his team across the finish line, he was not the star of the game. That distinction belonged to Karl-Anthony Towns, who in these first two games, has thoroughly outplayed Wembanyama. KAT scored 21 points and grabbed 13 rebounds. As of right now, he has the inside track to be finals MVP. 

Mikal Bridges also had an impressive game. After being held to 9 points in game one, he scored 20 in game two. OG Anunoby and Landry Shamet had 17 and 13 points respectively. The only starter that did not have a good game was Josh Hart. After impressive game one, he got into early foul trouble in game two, was limited to only 18 minutes and was a minus 3.

So now the Knicks return home to Madison Square Garden up 2-0; the first time in franchise history that they've won the first two games of a finals. No team in NBA history has successfully come back to win the championship after dropping the first two games at home, and the way this Knicks team is playing, I doubt the Spurs are going to be the first team to do it.

It's not that the Spurs are a bad team; far from it. They are the best team New York has faced in these playoffs. They led the Knicks late in the fourth quarter of both games. The case could easily be made that San Antonio could be up 2-0 instead of down 0-2.

But the fact remains that they are down 0-2, and it is up to the Knicks to make sure it becomes 0-3 and not 1-2 Monday night. This is not the time to take the foot off the gas, not with a chance to close out the series in their building.

So what is the best way to insure that? 

Well, for starters, it would behoove New York to get off to a faster start. They trailed after the first quarter in games one and two. The Knicks are playing with fire if they think they can continually come from behind in this series. Sooner or later, it will catch up with them.

Next, it is all too apparent that the Spurs are targeting Brunson in this series. In the first two games, he shot a collective 19-56 from the field. The only thing that has saved the Knicks is their depth. Mike Brown simply has more players on his bench that he can turn to than Mitch Johnson. But Brunson has to realize that when he gets double teamed, he needs to give up the ball. Earlier in the playoffs, the Knicks were very successful running their offense through KAT. It's time to go back to that formula.

And speaking of KAT, he needs to continue dominating Wemby, both at the perimeter and in the post. Aside from the fourth quarter in game two, the "Alien" has looked lost in this series. Towns has to make sure it stays that way. 

Throughout this postseason, the Knicks have been a marvel to behold. Their talent, poise and maturity have led them this far. They need two more wins to secure their first title since 1973. 

This is their moment; they need to grab it. 

Captain Clutch Answers the Bell

What do Willis Reed and Jalen Brunson both have in common? Aside from wearing the same jersey and being captain of the team, they're the only Knicks to score 30 or more points in game one of the NBA finals. Reed scored 37 points on 16-30 shooting against the Los Angeles Lakers in 1970 while Brunson scored 30 on 12-31 shooting against the San Antonio Spurs. But it was what Brunson did in the fourth quarter that mattered the most.

Trailing 65-51 with 6:31 remaining in the third quarter, New York went on a 25-11 run to tie the score at 76 going into the fourth. That was when Captain Clutch took control. The Brunson Burner scored 13 points on 5-9 shooting, 1-1 from three, to lead the Knicks to a 105-95 win and a 1-0 lead in the series.

We've seen this movie so many times before it's almost become routine. Whenever the Knicks have needed someone to step up and lead them to victory, Brunson has always answered the bell. His fourth-quarter playoff heroics since becoming a Knick are legendary. But this postseason, they have risen to unheard of heights. Compare the two slash lines below:

Brunson's career fourth-quarter playoff stats:
57 GP / 8.8 Pts / 49.5 FG% / 43.0 3P% / 84.6 FT% / +147

Brunson's 2026 fourth-quarter playoff stats:
15 GP / 9.8 Pts / 59.0 FG% / 61.5 3P% / 92.6 FT% / +58

Now check out the 2026 fourth-quarter playoff stats for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander:

15 GP / 6.3 Pts / 41.7 FG% / 25.0 3P% / 94.3 FT% / +37

Be honest. Which player would you rather have in the fourth quarter of a playoff game? Need more convincing? Since 2023, Brunson has more clutch points in the playoffs (144) than Gilgeous-Alexander (84). If you still prefer SGA, I seriously doubt your basketball acumen.

But lest we think Brunson was flying solo, he did have some help. Karl-Anthony Towns had probably his best playoff game as a Knick, The 7-0 center outplayed his 7-4 counterpart Victor Wembanyama, scoring 18 points and recording his 10th double-double of the postseason. And Josh Hart - everybody's favorite Swiss Army knife - grabbed a game-high 15 rebounds, had six steals and led all players with a plus 22. 

The Knicks held the Spurs to 40 points in the second half - 19 in the fourth quarter - and under 100 for the game. The last time San Antonio was held to under 100 points was, ironically enough, against this very same Knicks team at the Garden on March 1.

The win was New York's 12th in a row and improved their road record to 7-1, with all seven wins coming by double digits. Their point differential this postseason is an NBA record plus 281. To put that into perspective, the 2017 Golden State Warriors and the 2001 Lakers - generally acknowledged to be the two most dominant playoff teams of the last 50 years - are a plus 230 and 204 respectively.

We are witnessing something truly rare in sports; so rare, in fact, it's almost inconceivable, even for a fanbase that's old enough to remember the last time they saw their team win a title. For those not old enough, there's simply no reference point here.

The most remarkable thing about this run is how yeoman-like the Knicks have been throughout it. Not once have they gloated, pounded their chests or prematurely celebrated. They refuse to look past the next game. They are singularly focused on one thing: bringing a championship to New York. To that end, everyone is committed, from Brunson to Towns to Mikal Bridges to OG Anunoby, who had 19 points - 12 in the fourth quarter - to Landry Shamet and Jose Alvarado, who had 13 and 7 points respectively. There are no small parts or insignificant contributions. Even Mitchell Robinson, who broke his right pinky finger a week ago and was listed as questionable before the game, had six rebounds and forced Wemby into a costly turnover in the closing minutes.

The Knicks poise is matched only by their sense of professionalism. As they left the court Wednesday night, you were hard-pressed to detect a modicum of self satisfaction in their faces. Indeed, their whole demeanor in the postgame presser was that of a team that knows it will need to improve their level of play in game two if they want to extend their winning streak to 13. When asked the following day if he was looking forward to going up 2-0 in the series, KAT simply replied it was 0-0 as far as he and his teammates were concerned. How typical.

Compare and contrast that to what we heard come out of the Spurs locker room. To a man they seemed genuinely surprised they had lost the game. Many of the comments made in their postgame presser were eerily similar to those made by the Cavs and Sixers in their postgame pressers. It’s almost as if they’ve bought into the false narrative that this team is not legit. Gee, I wonder where they could've gotten that from.

The Hawks were supposed to give the Knicks a hard time; the Sixers were going to represent the East; the Cavs analytically won. For six weeks now we've heard every possible rationalization from the so-called experts that what we're seeing with our very own eyes isn't real; that it's only a mirage. Just wait until the Knicks face a real opponent from the West; then they'll come back down to Earth. There's been an astonishing lack of respect for what this team has accomplished so far during these playoffs.

Nowhere is that lack of respect more apparent than in the way Brunson has been treated. Despite the above stats, he didn't get a single first place vote for MVP this year. All this guy does is find ways to help his team win. And yet his detractors remain unconvinced. He's too small; he not a dude; he's not a 1A. It's worth noting that every player who finished ahead of him in the MVP voting, except for one, is watching the finals at home. Think about that.

The reality is that this Knicks team is not only legit; it's three wins away from winning its first NBA title since 1973. When that happens, the sight of Jalen Brunson hoisting the Larry O'Brien trophy as Finals MVP will be the ultimate comeuppance for every self-anointed genius who questioned his bonafides.

I can hardly wait.

Knicks Playoff Preview (NBA Finals)

"As long as we're here, we might as well win. There's no guarantee we're going to be back."

 - Rangers captain Dave Maloney, prior to the 1979 Stanley Cup Finals. 

This is the first time since I started this blog that I will be doing a finals preview of the Knicks. Typically by June, I'm either writing about another failed postseason by the Rangers or speculating on when the Mets will fold. So this is special for me. It's also special for millions of long-suffering Knicks fans, some of whom weren't even born the last time they made the finals.

It's fitting that the Knicks will be facing the San Antonio Spurs in this series; 27 years ago they lost to the Spurs in five, in what would become the first of five NBA titles for San Antonio over a 15 year period. Contrary to what each team's respective fanbase is boasting, this will not be a short series. Indeed, I would be shocked if it didn't go at least six games.

Since Victor Wembanyama came into the league three years ago, each team has won three games on their home court. New York's win in the NBA Cup was on a neutral site. Aside from that Cup final game, the Knicks have had two significant and memorable wins against the Spurs: a 117-114 thriller on Christmas Day last season and a 114-89 rout March 1 this season; the latter one of only three losses the Spurs had from February 1 through the end of the regular season; the other two were against the Denver Nuggets.

This postseason, New York and San Antonio have the two best defensive ratings: the Knicks at 104.4 and the Spurs at 106.1; the Knicks are shooting 40 percent from three while the Spurs are shooting 36.5 percent from three; and the Knicks bench is averaging 31.3 points per game vs 32.6 points per game for the Spurs. These two team couldn't be more close if they shared a sleeping bag.

If there's one advantage the Knicks have going for them, it's that they've played four fewer games this postseason than the Spurs. In the history of the NBA playoffs, teams that are coming off a four-game sweep are 20-4 against teams that needed a full seven games; 5-3 in the finals. Since May 4, the Knicks have played a total of eight games - four in 23 days! - while the Spurs have played 13. The Knicks will be the more rested team in this series.

And they will need every bit of that rest in order to end their 53 year drought. The Spurs may not be the 2017 Golden State Warriors, but they are most definitely NOT the Cavs or the Sixers. They represent the toughest challenge the Knicks will face in these playoffs. Don't expect any 30 point blowouts. Every game is likely to go down to the wire. If you're a fan of hotly contested series, you're in for one helluva treat.

The prevailing sentiment among the so-called experts is that this series will come down to Wembanyama vs. Jalen Brunson. After all, those are the two best players on their respective teams. Far be it for me to disagree with the experts but in my opinion, this series will come down to the wings: Mikal Bridges, OG Anunoby and Josh Hart vs. Devin Vassell, De'Aaron Fox and Julian Champagne. Off the bench, Landry Shamet and Deuce McBride will have to hold their own against Keldon Johnson and Dylan Harper.

Even allowing for all that, here are the four keys to the Knicks winning their first title since 1973.

1. KAT needs to stay out of foul trouble. Regardless of how many minutes per game Mitchell Robinson plays in this series - and the assumption is he will dress - look for the Spurs to target Karl-Anthony Towns on defense. It will be up to KAT not to take stupid fouls. To be effective, he has to be on the court, not on the bench.

2. Knicks need to make their threes. As I stated above, the Knicks are shooting 40 percent from downtown in the playoffs. That must continue in this series. If they go cold, the Spurs will win. The best way to insure that doesn't happen is by moving the ball around. The Knicks were 43-11 during the regular season when they had 25 or more assists. 

3. Make Wemby work on offense and defense. Imagine a player with the physical attributes of Hakeem Olajuwon and the shooting prowess of Steph Curry. That's who Wembanyama is. But as great as he is, the Oklahoma City Thunder still managed to limit his impact. By using a combination of Anunoby, Hart and Robinson, the Knicks hope they can wear him out. And on the other end of the court, if KAT can pull Wemby away from the basket, that will improve the Knicks chances of scoring in the paint. He can't block what he can't get to.

4. Avoid costly turnovers. Of the four teams that advanced to the conference finals, only the Thunder averaged fewer turnovers per game than the Knicks. In what promises to be a tight series, New York can't afford to be careless with the ball.

After the Rangers finally won the Stanley Cup in 1994, Sam Rosen made the pronouncement that it would "last a lifetime." Knicks fans have waited more than a lifetime to celebrate another championship. Their waiting will soon be over.

27 years ago, the Spurs were the better team. That is not the case this time around. This is the most talented roster the Knicks have had since the glory days of Clyde and Willis. Despite the trolling of the anti-New York media, these players have earned their way to a finals berth; and in another two weeks, they will earn their way to an NBA title.

Knicks in six.