In Leon We Trust

When Leon Rose decided to move on from Tom Thibodeau last June, he had no replacement for him. He attempted to interview several candidates, including Jason Kidd of the Dallas Mavericks, but was denied permission each time. Critics jumped all over him. How could he fire the franchise's most successful head coach since Jeff Van Gundy and not have a successor lined up?

One month later, Rose finally found his man; a coach that had been fired four times in his career, twice by the same organization. Again, his critics pounced. Well, we all know what happened. Mike Brown, in his first season, lead the Knicks to their first title since 1973. So much for not having a Plan B.

When the Boston Celtics signed Mitchell Robinson to a three-year contract at $15.6 million per on the first day of free agency, the critics in the cheap seats were at it again. How could Rose let this happen? Why couldn't the Knicks just go over the second apron to re-sign him? Once again, no Plan B.

It took Rose less than three days to find Robinson's replacement. Like Mike Brown a year ago, Andre Drummond was not his first choice. According to Chris Haynes, Rose had his sites set on Yves Missi of the New Orleans Pelicans, but was rejected "multiple times." Apparently, they view him as a "vital core" player. I wasn't aware that a 26 win team had vital core players.

But regardless of whether Drummond was Rose's first choice or his fourth, the point is he was the best option out there. And if we're being honest with ourselves, the slash line between the two men is very close. How close? Take a look see:

Robinson: 60 GP / 19.6 MP / 5.7 PPG / 8.8 TRB / 1.2 Blk / 0.9 AST / 41 FT% / $15.6m 

Drummond: 63 GP / 19.5 MP / 6.4 PPG / 8.4 TRB / 0.8 Blk / 1.3 AST / 63 FT% / $2.45m

You tell me, if you were Leon Rose, which player would you have signed? If you still prefer Robinson, I seriously don't know what slash line you're looking at. Drummond isn't just the better value; he's the better player. One thing's for certain: the Knicks won't have to worry about "Hack-a-Mitch" anymore. And with the money Rose saved by signing Drummond, he can now re-sign Jordan Clarkson and maybe even sign Kevon Looney. Along with Landry Shamet, Jose Alvarado and Deuce McBride, the Knicks, for the second season in a row, will have the deepest bench in the NBA. How's that for a Plan B?

You don't run an organization with your heart, you run it with your head. Even if James Dolan had been willing to go over the second apron, Rose would've been a fool to do so, especially for a player who doesn't play back-to-back games, can't hit free throws, and in the postseason, allowed Onyeka Okongwu, Joel Embiid, Evan Mobley, Jarrett Allen and Victor Wembanyama to shoot 57 percent against him. You don't pay someone like that $15.6 million; you thank him for his service and send him on his way. If anything, the Celtics did the Knicks a huge favor. 

That's the way Rose has rolled ever since he arrived in New York six years ago. His critics don't always understand him; the media doesn't always understand him; sometimes his own players don't always understand him. It may seem at times like he's flying by the seat of his pants, but the fact is he never does anything without having a plan A, B, C or D ready to go.

Leon Rose is the principal reason why the Knicks won the NBA championship this past season, and he's the principal reason why they should be considered the favorites to repeat going into this season. Yes, I realize Jalen Brunson carried them on his back, especially in game five of the finals, but it was Rose who brought Brunson to New York and it was Rose who gave him the supporting cast he needed to complete the job.

The man knows what he's doing. Leave him alone and let him cook. 

Drury's Last Stand?

If there were any doubts about whether the New York Rangers were rebuilding or retooling, they were  thoroughly put to rest yesterday. On the first day of free agency, Chris Drury sent a very loud and clear message to the fanbase: this is a retool.

Coming off arguably his best draft since he was hired, Drury went to work immediately. At first, it looked like a typical free agency day for Drury; nothing spectacular. And then it got real interesting. In all, Drury made nine transactions. Here they are in order: 

1. He acquired goaltender Joonas Korpisalao from the Boston Bruins for forward Kalle Vaisanen and a 2028 4th round pick. The Ottawa Senators retained $1 million of Korpisalao's $4 million salary as part of an earlier trade with the Bruins.

2. He then signed Joseph Valeno to a one year $1.2 million contract that he can unload at the trade deadline if it doesn't work out.

3. Next up, he signed Oliver Bjorkstrand to another one year contract at $4.5 million. 

4 & 5.. To replenish Hartford, he signed career AHLers Marc Del Gaizo and Glenn Gawdin to two-year, two-way contracts worth $875k AAV a piece. 

Then came the two blockbusters:

6. Drury traded Vincent Trocheck to the Utah Mammoth for Utah's 2024 1st round pick Cole Beaudoin, a conditional 2027 3rd rounder and defenseman Sean Durzi. Beaudoin was the high draft pick Drury was after, and Durzi is a right-handed defenseman who had an excellent season for Utah last year.

7. Drury then traded a 2030 top 10 protected first round pick for defenseman Marcus Pettersson. Pettersson played for Mike Sullivan in Pittsburgh years ago, and I have no doubt that factored into Drury's decision to acquire him. This trade was actually announced before the Trocheck deal but took longer to finalize because Pettersson has a no move clause. 

8. Next up, in what can only be described as a textbook example of addition by subtraction, Drury traded Will Borgen to the Bruins for a 2027 2nd round pick and a conditional 2028 3rd rounder. A used puck bag would've sufficed, so give Drury high marks for finding someone willing to take Borgen and his $4.1 million cap hit off his hands.

9. Rounding out the transactions, this morning, Drury signed Dennis Cholowski, another career AHLer, to a two-year, two-way contract. 

Overall, I'd give him a B+. He unloaded Borgen, improved his defensive pairings, but weakened his center depth. In Pettersson, he acquired a player who's 30 years old and still has five years left on his contract. Like the J.T. Miller trade he made in 2025, this has the potential of blowing up in Drury's face.

Look, are the Rangers better now than they were before the Draft? Yes. Have they improved themselves enough to make the playoffs? Maybe.

But here's my concern. Let's say the Rangers sneak in as a wild card this season. Let's be optimistic and say they upset the Carolina Hurricanes in the first round. Then what? Does anybody seriously believe this team can win the Stanley Cup? Me neither.

And that brings me to the sixty-four thousand dollar question. What's the plan? Is this the start of another three-year window followed by consecutive seasons without making the playoffs? How many more times do we have to ride this sick roller coaster? I was 33 the last time this franchise won the Stanley Cup. I was hoping to see one more before I die.

That's the biggest problem I have with Drury. He keeps making the same mistakes over and over again. Name one time when he didn't take a short cut. From the moment he got the job, he's seemed more interested in keeping it than doing the hard work required to win a championship. Case in point: J.T. Miller. Rather than admit he made a mistake and buy out his contract, he's determined to keep him, no matter how badly his skills have deteriorated. The signing of Bjorkstrand is another case in point. Yes, he's a good player, but at this stage of his career he's basically a bottom six forward. How much you wanna bet Sullivan puts him on the second line, thus taking a spot away from a younger player?

Take a good look at the job Leon Rose has done with the Knicks. In six years he transformed one of the worst franchises in professional sports into NBA champions. And he did that without taking a single short cut; by making the tough decisions that needed to be made; by thinking long term instead of short term; and while working for the same boss Drury reports to: James Dolan. Don't tell me you can't succeed with a demanding owner.

There's a reason why the Rangers have won only one Stanley Cup since World War II. They just haven't been good enough to win another. With Chris Drury at the helm, that isn't likely to change anytime soon.

Drury Goes 4 for 4 on Draft Night

As you might've surmised, I haven't been writing much about the Rangers lately. In fact, this is only my third piece on them since Thanksgiving. You can hardly blame me, what with the Knicks having their best season in over five decades.

It's been a rough couple of years for Chris Drury. From the heights of winning the President's trophy to the depths of consecutive seasons without making the playoffs, he's earned every bit of grief that's come his way. But as critical as I've been of him, I do believe in giving credit where credit is due. 

Going into the 2026 NHL Draft, the pressure on Drury was enormous. He had two picks in the first round: the 5th and 26th; he had a center he was looking to unload; another center he had his eye on; a boatload of cap space with a shopping list; and a fanbase that was growing increasingly frustrated at the constant failures and the tired excuses. To be perfectly honest, I wasn't expecting much.

How wrong I was. Maybe it was the carryover effect from Leon Rose, but Drury had one his best nights of his tenure as President and GM. 

It began with a bombshell trade: The Rangers acquired the rights to Pavel Dorofeyev from the Vegas Golden Knights in exchange for the 26th and 92nd picks in this year's draft and a top 10 protected first rounder in 2028. Dorofeyev led the Golden Knights in goals scored the last two season with 37 and 35 respectively, but he was an RFA and Vegas didn't have the cap space to re-sign him. That Drury was able to land him without giving up the better of his two first round picks was quite a feather in his cap.

The night was just getting started, however. With the 5th pick, he chose Alberts Smits, a burly left-handed defenseman who, at the age young age of 18, played for Team Latvia in the Olympics. Though fans were hoping for Carsons Carels and Chase Reid - both of whom have higher ceilings - Drury went with the player a majority of scouts say is NHL ready. I would not be at all surprised if he plays opening night on the second pairing.

But you know the old saying: the best trades are the ones you don't make. The day before the draft, Frank Seravalli tweeted that the Rangers were one of two teams that were in negotiation with the Anaheim Ducks for the services of Mason McTavish. It's no secret that McTavish had been on Drury's radar for quite some time. If history was any indicator, most of us were fearing the worst. The Rangers were about to overpay for a good, but hardly elite, center. When news broke that the Ducks had traded McTavish to the St. Louis Blues for two first round picks, the sighs of relief could be heard from 8th Avenue to the Van Wyck.

Last but not least, there's Vincent Trocheck. Drury has been looking to move the second-line center since before the trade deadline, but his asking price has been a first round pick and a high-level prospect. When he didn't get what he was looking for, rather than sell low, he opted to keep him and wait until the Draft to try again. Like the McTavish situation, the fear was that Drury would panic, but damn if he didn't surprise us again. I said it back in March, and I'll say it agin: it wouldn't be the worst thing in the world if Trocheck was still on the roster next season. At $5.6 million, he has a very manageable cap hit, and he's still capable of putting up 60 points. There's no need to move him just for the sake of moving him. Drury undoubtedly feels the same way. Good for him.

Well, what'd ya know? Four opportunities to do the right thing and Drury went four for four. Can dogs and cats sleeping together be far behind. I haven't said this in a while, but well done.

Now before we get too far ahead of ourselves, it's important to keep in mind that even with the addition of Dorofeyev this is still not a playoff team. Whether Drury trades Trocheck or not, we still don't know how good Gabe Perrault is; or whether Alexis Lafreniere's last 20 games of the regular season was the real deal or just a mirage; or whether JT Miller has anything left in the tank; or whether anyone other than Adam Fox and Vladislav Gavrikov can play defense.

If this is indeed a retool, it's far from complete. There's still a lot more work that needs to be done. The good news is that after locking up Dorofeyev to a 7 year x $11 million AAV contract, Drury has $15 million in available cap space to work with; the most he's had since he was hired in 2021. 

If he's smart, he'll put it to good use. 

Second Aprons for Dummies

Far be it from me to defend James Dolan. Since he assumed ownership of the Knicks and Rangers in 1999, both franchises have basically spun their wheels. The Rangers missed the playoffs 12 out of 27 seasons; the Knicks, until the arrival of Leon Rose, made the playoffs three times from 2001 to 2020. Indeed, the best decision Dolan ever made in his entire life was to hire Rose to run the Knicks organization. Trust me, it's easy to despise this man.

But the flack he's taking over his comments on WFAN that the Knicks would not go over the second apron is undeserved and totally uncalled for. First off, I doubt if Dolan even knows what an apron is; if you think he does, you're giving him way too much credit. Remember, this was the same guy who thought Phil Jackson and Isaiah Thomas were capable of running his team when even a neophyte could tell they were in over their heads. Everything he knows about basketball could probably fit on the back of a fortune cookie.

No, the decision to stay under the second apron came from Rose, and not because he was worried about the extra money his boss might have to dole out. The man shits money the way a sugar addict downs jelly beans. The fact is there are profound ramifications for going over the second apron. Before I list what they are, a brief history is in order.

The apron system was enacted in July of 2023 and went into effect in the '24 offseason. There are two aprons: the first and the second. The first apron acts as a sort of luxury tax trigger. While there are some penalties, they are not too severe. Most teams in the NBA have, at one time or another, gone over it. 

The second apron, however, is where the shit hits the fan. It's the league's way of saying you fucked up and now there's a price to be paid. These are the penalties for going over the second apron:

1. No salary aggregation. That means teams cannot combine salaries in order to acquire a player. In other words, no two for ones.

2. No sign and trades. Pretty much self explanatory. 

3. No cash in trades. Teams are prohibited from including cash in any trade.

4. No mid-level exceptions. Teams can only sign free agents to minimum contracts.

5. No buy-out signings. This applies to players who made more than the mid-level exception in their previous salary.

6. Frozen draft picks. First round picks that are seven years out cannot be traded.

Basically, teams that go into the second apron can only do the following things: 1. sign their own draft picks; 2. sign their own free agents; and 3. sign other teams free agents to minimum contracts. That's it. 

Over the last three seasons, seven teams have gone over the second apron: the Boston Celtics (2024-25); the Phoenix Suns (2024-25 & 2025-26); the Minnesota Timberwolves (2024-25); the Milwaukee Bucks (2024-25); the Cleveland Cavaliers (2025-26); the Golden State Warriors (2023-24 transition phase); and the Los Angeles Clippers (2023-24 transition phase). Of those teams, only the Cavs are still over the second apron, though the Oklahoma City Thunder are currently flirting with it.

Why have so few teams gone over the second apron? Because it's the closest thing to purgatory on Earth for a sports franchise, that's why. Leon Rose has come close twice, but resisted crossing that threshold both times. There's no indication that the third time will be any different. Just the opposite, in fact. During the NBA draft, Rose traded his first round pick for five second round picks, then traded back in the second round. Those are not the moves of a man who plans on going over the second apron; they are the moves of a man who is doing everything humanly possible to stay under it.

Throughout his tenure as President and GM of the Knicks, Rose has had pretty much free reign to run the basketball operations as he sees fit, and Dolan, for his part, has gone along with it. Anybody who thinks that the decision to stay under the second apron was driven by money hasn't been paying attention. Rose knows more about the nuances of cap management and salary negotiations than anyone in the sport. He should; he was one of the most successful agents before coming to New York. The last thing he would do is box himself in; which is what going over the second apron would do. The man built a championship roster; you think he doesn't know how to replace a couple of bench players?

For fuck's sake, grow up. 

Look, Mitchell Robinson was a valuable member of this team, but Bill Russell he wasn't. Rose will find a suitable replacement for him, and probably for less money. Landry Shamet, likewise, played an integral role coming off the bench, but if he chooses to leave, it won't be the end of the world. The Knicks starting five is still, overall, the best in the NBA. I trust that Rose and his staff will be able to assemble a nine-man rotation for Mike Brown capable of defending the title in time for the season opener.

If nothing else, he's earned the benefit of the doubt. 

Winning Changes Everything

No sooner had the New York Knicks parade down the Canyon of Heroes concluded than the focus turned from celebration to concern over whether they could keep their roster together for next season. Unlike players, GMs have no offseason. With James Dolan making it clear that the team would not go into the second apron, Leon Rose was faced with a basic arithmetic problem. He has $16.9 million in available cap space and only nine players signed. The NBA requires each team to carry a minimum of 14. How to divide five into 16, that is the question.

One of those five players is none other than Mitchell Robinson, the center whose rebound off a missed free throw in game five helped seal the Knicks first title in 53 years. Last season, Mitch made just a shade under $13 million. The prevailing view is that he's looking for a pay raise. Now you see the dilemma.

Heading into the NBA Draft, the Knicks had picks 24, 31 and 55. Pick 24 was a first rounder and carried a $3.3 million cap reserve, meaning if Rose had taken a player with that pick, that reserve would've gone immediately against the team's salary cap. $16.9 million minus $3.3 million leaves $13.6 million. Rose couldn't let that happen, so he made a series of moves that surprised even his biggest supporters. 

First he traded pick 24 to the Lakers for pick 25 and cash. He then used that pick to select Sergio Da Larrea from Spain in what wold've been a draft and stash maneuver that the NBA allows teams to get away with to avoid a cap hit. Then he traded Da Larrea to the Mavs for pick 30, which turned out to be Koa Peat and two future second-round picks. Peat was then traded to the Suns for pick 47 in this draft and two future second rounders.

So to sum up, in a little less than 20 minutes, Rose turned his 24th pick, which he never had any attention of keeping, into five second-round picks, one of which is number 47. And he was able to do this with every team in the NBA knowing full well that he had a cap problem. Don't ever play poker or chess with this man. You'll lose everything you own.

So what does Rose do tonight? Does he trade all three of his picks? Does he trade two and keep one? That all depends on what the demand is. It is almost a given that he will trade pick 31 for more future draft capital. But he could use his 47th pick to draft Robinson's replacement.

Let's face it, while Mitch is a fan favorite and an excellent rebounder, the man can't hit a free throw to save his life. Seriously, this guy makes Ben Simmons look like Kareem. Last season, he shot 41 percent from the free-throw line; 29 percent in the postseason. Every team in the NBA employs the hack-a-Mitch tactic. It's not a question of if they use it but when. It's hard to imagine there isn't a center in this draft who could do better for considerably less money.

One of those centers is Ugonna Onyenso from Virginia. He has a 7-5 wing span and is considered an excellent rim protector. ESPN's mock draft has him going to the Magic at 46. If he's there at 47, Rose should definitely take him. The rookie cap hit for a second-round pick is $1.362 million. That's $11.6 million less than Robinson made last season. The thing fans need to keep in mind is that this isn't a buffet, it's a garage sale, and Rose is under no obligation to pick anyone. 

Regardless of whether the Knicks draft a center in the second round or go the free agency rout, it's safe to say that Robinson has played his last game as a Knick. That's the advantage of winning; it gives you the option of thinking long term instead of short term. Had the Knicks lost to the Spurs in the finals, Rose might be tempted to try and convince Dolan to run it back. He doesn't have to do that now. He knows his core is intact. He can fill out the roster anyway he likes.

To a certain extent he's already doing that. Just hours before the draft, Shams Charania reported that the Knicks had re-signed Mohammed Diawara to a four year extension believed to be just over $10 million. At 6-9, Diawara looks like a young Pascal Siakam. It was a savvy move by Rose to lock him up to a team-friendly deal. I expect he will get more playing time next season. Another player who could see more minutes next season is Tyler Kolek, especially if the Knicks lose Landry Shamet in free agency. And then there's last season's free agent pickup, Jose Alvarado. He has a $4.5 million player option. I expect he will opt out and sign a multi-year extension soon. It's nice having options, isn't it?

To quote Mel Brooks, "It's good to be the king." The Knicks are the kings of the NBA.

Long live the kings. 

Where Jalen Brunson Ranks in the Pantheon of Clutch New York Athletes

As I was watching Jalen Brunson address the crowd at the Knicks parade, I couldn't help but notice an air of vindication in his words. Yes, he thanked James Dolan and the front office for believing in him; his teammates for giving him the confidence; the coaching staff and trainers; and of course the fans.

But it was what he said in closing that resonated most with the two million or more fans who turned out to watch the parade live and the millions more who tuned in to watch it on TV.

"There's a lot of people that have a lot of negative stuff to say. There's a lot of people who have a lot of opinions. But when you prove them wrong, you really don't have to say shit to them. Nah, they don't deserve it. Appreciate y'all. Thank you."

That's about as close to saying "fuck you" as Brunson is capable of. But if ever there was someone who was entitled to say "fuck you" to his detractors, it would be Brunson. Since his arrival on Broadway, this man has endured every kind of slight imaginable.

One of those slights came at the hands of a certain person whose name I shall not bother to mention here. As Brunson said, she doesn't deserve it. But for those who need a reminder, the incident occurred two years ago. This individual made it a point to say Brunson was too small and was "not a dude," whatever the fuck that means. She then went on to explain that since John Stockton and Allen Iverson didn't win, and they were small, that meant Brunson couldn't win either.

For those who actually know a thing or two about basketball, and who also know what the word context means, allow me to turn back the clock a bit. Stockton was a point guard who played for the Utah Jazz from 1984 to 2003. The Jazz went to two consecutive NBA finals in '97 and '98, where they unfortunately met up with the Chicago Bulls, who just happened to be working on their second three-peat. Stockton and Karl Malone played their hearts out, but they couldn't stop Micheal Jordan and the Bulls. They lost both series 4-2.

Like Stockton, Iverson was a point guard who played for the Philadelphia 76ers from 1996 to 2010. In 2001, the Sixers advanced to the finals, where they met up with the Los Angeles Lakers, who were also in the middle of going for a three-peat. That Lakers team had Shaquille O'Neil and Kobe Bryant on it. The Sixers were valiant but the Lakers were too much for them. They lost 4-1. Ironically, the only game LA lost that whole postseason was against Philly in the finals.

My point is Stockton and Iverson's size had absolutely nothing to do with them not winning a title. Their teams just happen to lose to two of the most dominant basketball dynasties of the last 30 years. There's no shame in admitting that, nor should there be. If Stockton and Iverson had been four inches taller, the results would've been the same. Iverson, in fact, averaged 33 points per game against the Lakers in that series.

Making general statements about an athlete's size as a bar against winning is the sort of thing trolls on social media do; it's not the sort of thing people who hold responsible positions in the media should do, and whether or not she apologizes, I hope the next time someone is asked to opine on the prospects of a player winning a championship, the reply that follows is an informed one.

Having said all that, I think what Brunson did this postseason ranks him among the top clutch New York athletes of all time. By clutch, I mean coming through in the playoffs. But where does it rank? I decided to compile a top ten list from the last 60 years.

Without further ado,

1. Eli Manning: The man lived in the shadow of his brother Peyton his whole career, yet when it mattered most, he came up big in Super Bowls 42 and 46, earning not only MVP in both games, but the distinction of being the only quarterback in NFL history to beat Tom Brady twice in the Super Bowl. His postseason passer rating in 2011 was 103.3, and he led the NFL in passing yards with 1219 and touchdowns with 9.

2. Mark Messier: He had one mission when he came to Broadway: end the curse of 1940. His "guarantee" and subsequent hat trick in game 6 of the '94 conference finals stands as one of the most iconic moments in Rangers history, and his game-winning goal against the Canucks in game 7 of the finals delivered New York its first Stanley Cup in 54 years.

3. Jalen Brunson: The player who was too small, too slow and not a number one option, tied Micheal Jordan for most points in a road close-out finals game. Captain Clutch's overall performance in the finals is the singular reason the Knicks were able to end their 53 year drought. The man not only deserves his flowers; he deserves a whole damn florist. 

4. Walt Frazier: When Willis Reed got injured in game five of the 1970 NBA finals, the Knicks needed someone to step up and take charge. That someone was Clyde. His 36 points and 19 assists in game 7 enabled New York to win the first of its two titles in the '70s.

5. Reggie Jackson: Mr. October was no stranger to winning in the postseason. He was an integral part of that Oakland A's team that won three consecutive World Series. But it was his performance in game 6 of the '77 World Series that forever cemented his place in New York folklore. His three home runs against the Dodgers helped the Yankees clinch their first title since 1962. 

6. Joe Namath: In the late 1960s, everyone knew the NFL was the dominant league. The Green Bay Packers had routed the Kansas City Chiefs and Oakland Raiders in Super Bowls 1 and 2, and now the Baltimore Colts were preparing to do the same to the Jets in Super Bowl 3. But Broadway Joe had other plans. He not only guaranteed his team would win, he went out and proved it. In what is still considered to this day the greatest upset in sports history, New York shocked Baltimore 16-7. The win not only made Namath a household name, it put the AFL on the map. One year later, the two leagues merged.

7. Mariano Rivera: Without question, the greatest closer in baseball history. He's the career leader in postseason saves (42), ERA (0.70) and WHIP (0.75). How impressive was Rivera? His ERA in the Yankees '98 and '99 playoff runs was 0.00 in 18 appearances. Indeed, from 1996 through 2000, he allowed just two earned runs in 56 innings. If there's such a thing as an automatic out, it was Rivera. 

8. Lawrence Taylor: From 1981 to 1993, the most feared defensive player in the NFL. He gave offensive coordinators fits and opposing quarterbacks nightmares. LT helped lead the Giants to two Super Bowl wins in '86 and '90, and turned Bill Belichick into a legend. 

9. Derek Jeter: In 7 World Series, Jeter had a batting average of .321, with an OPS of .832. Overall in the postseason, he hit .308 with 20 homers and 61 RBIs. During his Yankee career, which lasted 20 years, he finished 6th in team RBIs (1311) and 8th in team batting average (.310). He was the most consistent clutch player to wear the Pinstripes since Mickey Mantle. 

10. Brian Leetch: The 1994 Conn-Smyth winner led the Rangers with 34 points during their Cup run. The Calder and two-time Norris trophy winner was a fixture on New York's blue line until he was traded to the Maple Leafs in 2004. He's second for most points by American-born defensemen with 1028, 204 behind Phil Housley. 

At Last!

"For the rest of your life, men, nobody can ever tell you that you couldn't do it because you did it."

Bill Parcells, after the Giants won Super Bowl 21

The New York Knicks are the 2026 NBA champions!

I still can't believe it. I felt the same way when the Rangers won the Stanley Cup in 1994. That's what 53 years of failures can do to you. It can make you doubt what your own eyes and ears are telling you.

Even as the final seconds were ticking off, I still thought that something was going to happen that would ruin this moment. Wembanyama would be fouled as he hit a three pointer, he would then convert the free throw to send the game into overtime, where the Spurs would win and force a game 6. The Knicks would lose that game at the Garden and then lose game 7 back in San Antonio.

Another failure in a long list of failures.

Except that didn't happen. Wemby missed his three-pointer, OG Anunoby grabbed the rebound with one second left and threw the ball up into the air in celebration. The Knicks held on to win 94-90 to wrap up the series in five. Mike Breen summed it up best as the final buzzer sounded:

"IT'S OVER, KNICK FANS! THIS IS NOT A DREAM! YOUR LONG, LONG WAIT HAS ENDED! GO AHEAD AND CRY!"

And cry I did; like a baby. Tears of joy streamed down my cheeks. All those years of disappointment and heartache came pouring out at once. I have a feeling I wasn't alone.

For all the players who have come and gone since the last championship - Bob McAdoo, Ray Williams, Michael Ray Richardson, Bill Cartwright, Campy Russell, Bernard King, Patrick Ewing, John Starks, Anthony Mason, Charles Oakley, Allan Houston, Larry Johnson, Latrell Sprewell, Stephon Marbury, Jeremy Lin, Carmelo Anthony, Amar'e Stoudemire, Tyson Chandler, J.R. Smith, R.J. Barrett, Julius Randle, Donte DiVincenzo, and all those I missed - this one's for you, too.

It wasn't easy. Like they had done in the previous four games, the men in orange and blue fell behind by double-digits in game five. For the series, New York was -57 in the first quarter, but +69 in the other three. That was the story of this final. The Knicks got stronger as the games wore on while the Spurs sputtered. The poise and resilience of the Knicks propelled them to victory while the immaturity and inexperience of the Spurs proved to be their undoing.

This was an historic run. The Knicks went 16-3 in the postseason, 9-1 on the road. The three losses were by a total of six points. Their overall point differential of 283 was 53 points higher than the 2017 Golden State Warriors: the team generally acknowledged as the best of all time. All four of their close out games came on the road. The 22 point comeback against the Cavs in game one of the Eastern Conference finals was surpassed only by their historic 29 point comeback against the Spurs in game four of the finals. Anyone who believes for a moment that this team did not earn its title doesn't know a damn thing about basketball.

The Finals MVP was, by unanimous vote, Jalen Brunson. On a night where the rest of his teammates didn't have it, the Captain dragged them across the finish line. His 45 points is tied with Michael Jordan for third most in a title-clinching game. He averaged 32.6 points per game in the finals, 28.4 overall in the playoffs. If there were any doubts that he was the best free-agent signing in NBA history they were put to bed in this series. His decision to leave $113 million on the table when he signed his latest contract is the reason this franchise ended its 53 year drought. It's no coincidence that after being slammed to the court by Wembanyama in game three, Brunson had his two best shooting performances in games four and five. The Russians were right: revenge is a dish best served cold. Not only is Brunson a "dude," he is, without question, the best clutch player in all of basketball.

But as great as Brunson was, he didn't do it all by himself; he had some help. OG Anunoby, Karl-Anthony Towns, Mikal Bridges and Josh Hart each contributed in their own way to the cause. Anunoby was making a case to be Finals MVP before Brunson dropped 45 in the clincher; Towns owned Wembanyama early in the series; Bridges made people forget about those draft picks; and Hart was pretty much a thorn in the side of San Antonio most of the series.

And now we come to the architect of this championship team. I think it's safe to say that Leon Rose was, without question, the best hire James Dolan has ever made as owner of this franchise. In addition to clearing out dead cap space, Rose methodically assembled one of the best rosters in the NBA. He hired Tom Thibodeau, signed Jalen Brunson, traded for Josh Hart, OG Anunoby, Mikal Bridges and Karl-Anthony Towns. And when he realized the Knicks had reached their ceiling with Thibodeau, he replaced him with Mike Brown. The only player he inherited that's still with the team is Mitchell Robinson.

Though Brown unleashed their potential, the toughness and resiliency that has come to define this group over the years came from Thibs. How else can you explain how this team was able to come back from 20 down multiple times over the past two postseasons? Any other team would've folded like a cheap tent. Not this one.

Even when they were going through that rough patch in January, the Knicks never wavered as a team. When they dropped games two and three against Atlanta and the season was hanging by a thread, they never lost their faith in one another. They knew they were up for the challenge and they proved it by winning 13 in a row and 15 of their last 16.

That's what makes them so beloved by their fans: that never say die attitude. Admit it: when they were down 10 early in the fourth, you knew they were going to pull it out, didn't you? So did the Spurs, I'm guessing.

And now this incredible season is over. The New York Knicks are the 2026 NBA champions. No one can ever take that away from them.

All that's left is the parade down the Canyon of Heroes Thursday morning. I was there when the Rangers had their parade in '94, and I will be there when the Knicks have theirs, along with about 3 to 5 million screaming and grateful fans.

They say all good things come to those who wait. To paraphrase the great Sam Rosen, Knicks fans have waited a lifetime for this moment. It's finally here.

The Better Team Wins

You know how you can tell which is the better team? It wins, that's how. Trust me, I have a lot of experience rooting for teams that have lost to better ones.

In 1973, the Mets lost to the A's in the World Series. Both teams were good; the A's were better.

In 1994, the Knicks lost to the Rockets in the NBA finals. Both team were good; the Rockets were better. 

In 2001, the Giants lost to the Ravens in Super Bowl 35. Both teams were good; the Ravens were better.

In 2014, the Rangers lost to the Kings in the Stanley Cup finals. Both teams were good; the Kings were better.

In 2015, the Mets lost to the Royals in the World Series. Again both teams were good; the Royals were better.

So far in the 2026 NBA finals, a lot of people have tied themselves up in knots coming up with reasons for why the Knicks couldn't possibly be the better team in this series. They point out that over the first four games, the Spurs have led for a total of 133 minutes while the Knicks have led for only 52 minutes, ergo the Spurs are better. Percentage of time led in basketball is about as meaningless as time of possession is in football. Many teams have won the time of possession while losing the game. It happens more than you think. Last time I checked, the only score that mattered was the final score.

Look, have the Spurs gotten off to good starts in these finals? Most definitely, yes. San Antonio has led at the end of all four first quarters. In fact, they've held double-digit leads in every game of this series. But as good as they've been in the first quarter, the Knicks have been better in the other three. New York is a collective -47 in the first quarter, but in quarters two, three and four, they're +24, +16 and +15 respectively. The 29-point lead the Spurs blew in the second half of game four represents the largest blown lead ever in an NBA final. That singular distinction belongs to them, not the Knicks.

This postseason, the Knicks have played better on the road than they have at Madison Square Garden. They're +171 away vs +108 at home. All three closeout games have occurred in the visitors arena, not one has been remotely close. Clearly, living out of a suitcase has not been a problem for this team.

The Knicks have the best player in this final; the best clutch player in all of basketball. They might even have the second best player. That is not a knock on the Spurs; it's just a fact based on everything we've observed from watching both these teams in the closing minutes. With the exception of game three, the Knicks have been the more composed, more poised and more mature team on the court. Their best players have simply been better than the Spurs best players, and Mike Brown has out-coached his counterpart Mitch Johnson.

Ask yourself this question. Who would rather have when the game is on the line: Jalen Brunson, OG Anunoby and Karl-Anthony Towns or De'Aaron Fox, Julian Champagnie and Victor Wembanyama? That was meant as a rhetorical question, by the way. I wasn't looking for an answer.

I don't know why this is so hard for some people to comprehend. The Knicks are not leading 3-1 because they've been lucky or because they had an easy path to the finals or even because the basketball gods are finally smiling on them. They're leading because they've been the better team.

Is it possible that the Spurs can come back and win this series? Of course it is. And if they do, guess what? They will be the better team.  But I sincerely doubt that will happen. I think this series ends tonight with the better team hoisting the Larry O'Brien trophy.

That's how this works; it's how it's always worked. There are no participation trophies when it comes to sports. There are just winners and losers. The winners get to celebrate with their teammates on a podium and receive a ring; the losers get to go home empty handed. 

Sorry if that ruins your narrative, but then I've never been very good at drawing narratives. Besides, I'm a Rangers fan. Who knows more about losing to a better team than us?

History

"Little roller up along first. Behind the bag, it gets through Buckner. Here comes Knight and the Mets win it!"

- Vince Scully, bottom of the 10th, Game 6, 1986 World Series

I will never forget the range of emotions I felt during that 10th inning in October of '86. The Mets were one pitch away from losing the World Series and I and my friends were despondent. Minutes later, I went from despondent to elated. Mookie Wilson had saved the season. There would be a game seven at Shea Stadium, after all, and the Mets would win it.

To be clear, last night's game at Madison Square Garden was not an elimination game for the New York Knicks. Had they lost, the finals would've been tied at two with game five in San Antonio Saturday night. But the stakes were no less high. A loss would've given the Spurs home court with the prospects of this promising postseason ending up like all the others: in bitter frustration. 

And for the first 24 minutes it certainly looked that way. Unlike game three - which was close throughout - game four was turning into a rout. The Knicks seemed about as interested in playing a basketball game as I was taking calculus in college. Karl-Anthony Towns picked up two fouls in the first minute of play; the latter courtesy of a terrible call on a challenge by Spurs coach Mitch Johnson. Jalen Brunson resumed his ISO ball which resulted in his teammates standing around like statues. And the vaunted New York defense, which had come to define this playoff run, was nowhere to be seen. San Antonio led 41-22 after one and 76-49 at halftime. 

The Spurs shot 28-47 (59.6%) from the field and 14-26 (53.8%) from three in the first half, while the Knicks shot 15-37 (40.5%) and 4-12 (33.3%) respectively. The Spurs also had more assists than the Knicks: 18 to 7. The Garden resembled more a mausoleum than a sports arena. Spike Lee looked like he was going to jump off the Brooklyn Bridge.

But then in the second half New York finally woke up. They started playing defense and began to move the ball around. The Knicks had 16 assists in the half, as they outscored the Spurs 58-30 to win the game 107-106 and take a 3-1 series lead back to San Antonio.

The turning point came with 9:27 to go in the third quarter. The Spurs were up 81-52 when Victor Wembanyama was hit with a flagrant foul 1 for elbowing Towns. KAT converted both free throws and the Knicks never looked back. They narrowed the gap to 90-75 going into the fourth and took their first lead of the game with 1:22 left in regulation. The Garden, which had been quiet most of the night, erupted. Mariska Hargitay and Taylor Swift were dancing in the aisles. Larry David was actually caught smiling.

While Brunson had 17 points in the half - 36 for the game - it was OG Anunoby who was the main hero. His block on De'Aaron Fox's layup with 11 seconds to go and his rebound shot with 1.2 seconds left to put his team up for good is the reason New York is one win away from its first championship in 53 years. Anunoby is also one of only five players in NBA finals history to score 30 or more points and the go-ahead field goal in the last three seconds of the game. The other four are Jerry West (1962), Kareem Abdul Jabbar (1974), Hakeem Olajuwon (1995) and Michael Jordan (1997).

Another unsung hero was Jose Alvarado. Mike Brown elected to put him and Brunson together in the backcourt to start the fourth. Alvarado scored 8 points and 3 assists in the quarter. Together, the pair was a plus 21 in 12 minutes. It was a brilliant move by the Knicks coach.

This was the third time in this series that the Knicks successfully overcame a double-digit deficit to win a game. They trailed by 14 points in game one, 12 in game two and 29 in game four; the latter an NBA record for a finals game. The previous record was held by the Celtics who overcame a 24-point deficit against the Lakers in 2008.

After shooting the lights out in the first half, the Spurs went ice cold in the second. They were 8-39 (20.5%) in the field and 3-17 (17.6%) from three. While the Knicks D had a lot to do with that, San Antonio helped them out with their decision making with the ball. For some reason, the Spurs attempted eight consecutive three-pointers up by 20 to 25 points, converting on only one. On twelve separate possessions they shot the ball with more than 10 seconds remaining on the shot clock. This "strategy" was eerily similar to the one the Celtics employed last year against the Knicks. The result was consecutive blown leads in games one and two and an eventual series defeat.

The number one offender for the Spurs was Fox. He had four turnovers in the second half, one of which was a backcourt violation. His decision to go for a layup in the closing seconds with this team up by one rather than dribble it out and let the Knicks foul him was inexplicable. Seconds after Anunoby blocked his shot, he scored the winning bucket. The two things you must do when you have a big lead is to use the clock to your advantage and don't turn the ball over. The Spurs did neither and it gave the Knicks the opening they needed to eventually win the game.

So now the Knicks have a chance to close out this series and put the Spurs out of their misery. They have yet to play a full 48 minutes in any of these games. Indeed, you could make the case that had it not been for San Antonio's ineptitude, New York might very well be trailing 3-1 instead of leading 3-1.

But that's water over the dam. Regardless of how they got here, the Knicks are one win away from winning their first championship since 1973. If they are smart they will take care of business Saturday night.

About the Officiating

Normally I don't like to talk about the officiating in games. While I don't have any data to support this, it's my belief that, with few exceptions, the officials don't impact the game. In the end, the players have more to say about the outcome than anyone wearing a striped shirt.

That being said, we need to talk about the officiating in this series. It's been terrible.

In game two, Tony Brothers clearly missed a foul committed by Julian Champagnie on an OG Aununoby three-point attempt. The original call was out of bounds and San Antonio ball. Mike Brown called a timeout to challenge the call. After reviewing the play, the call was reversed and Anunoby was awarded three foul shots, which he converted.

At the time the score was tied at 97 with 2:37 left in the fourth quarter. The Knicks won the game by a single point, 105-104. If Brown did not have a challenge available, the Knicks might very well have lost that game and would currently be trailing 2-1 in this best of seven series.

In game three, the Spurs had 10 more free throw attempts than the Knicks. In the second half alone, they were 20-24 from the free throw line compared to 6-8 for the Knicks. The primary reason for this discrepancy was that New York was in the penalty within the first four minutes of each quarter. Fouls that the refs were letting go in the first half, they started calling in the second. Players pretty much all agree that the thing they want most from the officials is consistency. If something isn't a foul in the first half, it shouldn't be a foul in the second. 

Speaking of the first half, the Knicks were rightly upset that Victor Wembanyama was not called for a foul when he threw Jalen Brunson to the court in the first quarter. The NBA reviewed the non-call the following day and determined that it did not rise to the level of a flagrant foul 1. What was so frustrating about the play is that it happened with the Knicks in possession. Landry Shamet, the ball handler, was literally standing five feet away from where the foul occurred. It is inconceivable that not one official saw what happened. Wemby was seen smirking almost immediately after the incident.

Mike Brown was also perturbed about the non-call. Borrowing a page out of Rick Carlisle's playbook, he used his postgame presser to let everyone know where he stood. It was an unusual move for Brown who typically focuses on how well his players execute on the court. Given the circumstances, one could hardly blame him. It was clear from the opening tip-off that the Spurs were trying to intimidate the Knicks. 

Look, I don't want to beat this like a dead horse, but these are the sorts of things that can leave a bad taste in fans mouths. It feeds a narrative that there are two kinds of rules in sports: one for the stars and one for everyone else. Don't believe me? Ask yourself this question: if Mitchell Robinson had thrown Stephon Castle to the court, what would've happened to him? I'll lay odds that he would've gotten a foul which would've been reviewed for a flagrant 1.

In the end, the Knicks did not lose game three because of lousy officiating; they lost it because, as I wrote in my previous piece, they reverted back to old habits. They can control that. What they can't control are the actions of the three men whose job it is to make sure that the rules are evenly enforced. Physical play is one thing; but intimidation like what we saw is another. 

I've been watching the NHL since the 1970s. I've seen all kinds of shit masquerading as hockey. The NBA went through a similar period in the late '80s and early '90s. Fortunately, it cleaned it up. The last thing any fan of the sport wants to see is a return to the "anything goes" days. After this series is over, Adam Silver would do well to meet with his people and set down some guidelines on how fouls are enforced. Either the rules apply to everyone or they apply to no one.

Some stars might squawk about it, but in the end, the integrity of the game is the only thing that matters.

Hold the Parade

"With the 5th pick in the 2026 NFL Draft, the New York Giants select Arvell Reese, linebacker, Ohio State."  - April 23, 2026.

It's hard to believe that the last time the New York Knicks lost a playoff game, John Harbaugh and Joe Schoen were high-fiving each other because the player they had at the top of their board fell into their laps at five. That was six and a half weeks ago.

God when you say it like that, it almost seems surreal.

Through the first half of game three, things were going pretty much according to script. The Spurs jumped out to an early double-digit lead, only to have the Knicks either close the gap or take the lead outright. At halftime, New York led 64-57, outscoring San Antonio 42-24 in the second quarter on 73.7 percent shooting. It was the most points ever scored by a Knicks team in a quarter in a finals game. The Garden faithful had visions of a four-game sweep; some, I suppose, were even planning where they would camp out on the parade route. 

But then the script flipped in the second half. The Spurs, aided by what seemed like an avalanche of calls in their favor, went to the free throw line 24 times to the Knicks 8. That discrepancy allowed them to regain the lead by the end of the third quarter; a lead they would never relinquish. The final score was 115-111. 

So much for a sweep. We now have a series on our hands; one in which the Knicks are still the favorites, but barely. 

So how did the Spurs end the Knicks 13 game win streak?

It wasn't so much what the Spurs did but what the Knicks didn't do. I wrote after game two that to win this series, New York was going to have to do three things: 1. Stop falling behind; 2. Get Jalen Brunson off the ball; and 3. Run the offense through Karl-Anthony Towns. They were 0-3.

It's one thing to know you're capable of coming from behind - and, let's face it, over the last two postseasons, the Knicks have become experts at it - it's quite another to a make a habit out of it. Teams that trail that much end up expending far too much energy chasing the game. As anyone who's ever watched a basketball or hockey game will tell you, it's easier to play with the lead than it is to play from behind. The Knicks have got to stop making it hard on themselves.

It was obvious from the start of the finals that San Antonio was going to target Brunson. That isn't James Harden out there. The Spurs guards know how to defend, and they've been on Brunson like white on rice. But rather than give up the ball, Captain Clutch has been forcing up difficult shots, many of which have not gone in. For the series, Brunson is 30-81 (37%). He's averaging 27 shots per game. According to StatMuse, the Knicks were 33-8 during the regular season when Brunson took 20 shots or fewer per game. By going ISO as much as he has, Brunson has unintentionally made his team easier to guard. It's no coincidence that the Knicks only had 18 assists in the game. During the regular season, they were 43-11 when they had 25 or more assists. The low assist total might account for why Mikal Bridges only had two points, his lowest point total since game three of the Atlanta series. 

Over the first two games, Towns played an integral role in the Knicks offense. So effective was he in distributing the ball and driving to the net that he was the front runner for finals MVP. Last night, he went 4-10 - 0-2 from three - for 11 points and had only 8 rebounds. Worse, he has not scored a single point in the fourth quarter in these finals. That is simply inexcusable. KAT owned Victor Wembanyama over the first two games. By not getting him the ball, Wemby went wild in game three, scoring a series high 32 points. The Knicks need to get back to what worked so well for them in the previous three rounds.

The good news? Even with the disparity on foul shots (84-61 in the series), the low assists total and Brunson's ball hogging, the Knicks lost by only four points. Overall, the shooting percentages of both teams were about equal. New York even had a slight edge in scoring in the paint and rebounds. In what was a must win for the Spurs, they hardly dominated.

The bad news? The Knicks may come away from this loss believing that all they have to do is tweak a few things and they'll be all right. That would be disastrous. What last night's loss revealed was that the Knicks have fallen back into some old habits; old habits that led to them trailing the Hawks 2-1 in the first round. They did not sweep the Sixers and the Cavs playing like this and they will most certainly not beat the Spurs playing this way. They need to snap out of it, and fast, or this series will be tied Wednesday night.

And if that happens, it is unlikely that the Spurs will lose three games in a row in their building. Meaning the Knicks could well be facing elimination in game six. If you think the mood at the Garden was sullen after last night's loss, just think what'll be like if the Knicks become the first team in NBA history to blow a finals after taking the first two games on the road.

That cannot be allowed to happen, and it won't happen as long as the proper adjustments are made. I said at the beginning of the series that the Knicks are the better team. I still believe that's true, but that presupposes that they play up to their potential. Apart from the second quarter, they did not do that last night. They must do it Wednesday night, and for a full 48 minutes.

There will be no excuses if they don't.

A Bakers Dozen

Admit it: When you saw Victor Wembanyama take that shot with 2 seconds left you had flashbacks of Tyrese Haliburton's game-tying shot from last year's Eastern Conference finals. Being a Knicks fan means learning how to deal with PTSD. It doesn't take much to ruin our day or night. And just so we're clear, even with Mitchell Robinson guarding him, Wemby probably makes that shot 9 out of 10 times. 

But there's something different about these Knicks. After blowing a 97-83 lead with 6:04 remaining in the fourth quarter, and trailing 104-102 with 57 seconds left, they found a way to win. Jalen Brunson, the hero of game one, once again came to the rescue. He scored the game's final three points, the last one a free throw after he stole a bad pass from Wemby and was fouled with 9.5 seconds to go. 

The Knicks have now won 13 playoff games in a row; two shy of the record set by the Golden State Warriors in 2017. They are, as Brian Windhorst said after the game, "a freakin' winning machine." I've heard of resiliency, but this is ridiculous.

Despite the final score, though, this was a game in which the Knicks pretty much dominated from the second quarter on. After trailing 34-25 at the end of the first quarter, New York took a 56-52 lead into the locker room at half time. They expanded that lead to 84-75 after three. And they were cruising to yet another double-digit road win before the Spurs went on their run.

But while Brunson may have dragged his team across the finish line, he was not the star of the game. That distinction belonged to Karl-Anthony Towns, who in these first two games, has thoroughly outplayed Wembanyama. KAT scored 21 points and grabbed 13 rebounds. As of right now, he has the inside track to be finals MVP. 

Mikal Bridges also had an impressive game. After being held to 9 points in game one, he scored 20 in game two. OG Anunoby and Landry Shamet had 17 and 13 points respectively. The only starter that did not have a good game was Josh Hart. After impressive game one, he got into early foul trouble in game two, was limited to only 18 minutes and was a minus 3.

So now the Knicks return home to Madison Square Garden up 2-0; the first time in franchise history that they've won the first two games of a finals. No team in NBA history has successfully come back to win the championship after dropping the first two games at home, and the way this Knicks team is playing, I doubt the Spurs are going to be the first team to do it.

It's not that the Spurs are a bad team; far from it. They are the best team New York has faced in these playoffs. They led the Knicks late in the fourth quarter of both games. The case could easily be made that San Antonio could be up 2-0 instead of down 0-2.

But the fact remains that they are down 0-2, and it is up to the Knicks to make sure it becomes 0-3 and not 1-2 Monday night. This is not the time to take the foot off the gas, not with a chance to close out the series in their building.

So what is the best way to insure that? 

Well, for starters, it would behoove New York to get off to a faster start. They trailed after the first quarter in games one and two. The Knicks are playing with fire if they think they can continually come from behind in this series. Sooner or later, it will catch up with them.

Next, it is all too apparent that the Spurs are targeting Brunson in this series. In the first two games, he shot a collective 19-56 from the field. The only thing that has saved the Knicks is their depth. Mike Brown simply has more players on his bench that he can turn to than Mitch Johnson. But Brunson has to realize that when he gets double teamed, he needs to give up the ball. Earlier in the playoffs, the Knicks were very successful running their offense through KAT. It's time to go back to that formula.

And speaking of KAT, he needs to continue dominating Wemby, both at the perimeter and in the post. Aside from the fourth quarter in game two, the "Alien" has looked lost in this series. Towns has to make sure it stays that way. 

Throughout this postseason, the Knicks have been a marvel to behold. Their talent, poise and maturity have led them this far. They need two more wins to secure their first title since 1973. 

This is their moment; they need to grab it. 

Captain Clutch Answers the Bell

What do Willis Reed and Jalen Brunson both have in common? Aside from wearing the same jersey and being captain of the team, they're the only Knicks to score 30 or more points in game one of the NBA finals. Reed scored 37 points on 16-30 shooting against the Los Angeles Lakers in 1970 while Brunson scored 30 on 12-31 shooting against the San Antonio Spurs. But it was what Brunson did in the fourth quarter that mattered the most.

Trailing 65-51 with 6:31 remaining in the third quarter, New York went on a 25-11 run to tie the score at 76 going into the fourth. That was when Captain Clutch took control. The Brunson Burner scored 13 points on 5-9 shooting, 1-1 from three, to lead the Knicks to a 105-95 win and a 1-0 lead in the series.

We've seen this movie so many times before it's almost become routine. Whenever the Knicks have needed someone to step up and lead them to victory, Brunson has always answered the bell. His fourth-quarter playoff heroics since becoming a Knick are legendary. But this postseason, they have risen to unheard of heights. Compare the two slash lines below:

Brunson's career fourth-quarter playoff stats:
57 GP / 8.8 Pts / 49.5 FG% / 43.0 3P% / 84.6 FT% / +147

Brunson's 2026 fourth-quarter playoff stats:
15 GP / 9.8 Pts / 59.0 FG% / 61.5 3P% / 92.6 FT% / +58

Now check out the 2026 fourth-quarter playoff stats for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander:

15 GP / 6.3 Pts / 41.7 FG% / 25.0 3P% / 94.3 FT% / +37

Be honest. Which player would you rather have in the fourth quarter of a playoff game? Need more convincing? Since 2023, Brunson has more clutch points in the playoffs (144) than Gilgeous-Alexander (84). If you still prefer SGA, I seriously doubt your basketball acumen.

But lest we think Brunson was flying solo, he did have some help. Karl-Anthony Towns had probably his best playoff game as a Knick, The 7-0 center outplayed his 7-4 counterpart Victor Wembanyama, scoring 18 points and recording his 10th double-double of the postseason. And Josh Hart - everybody's favorite Swiss Army knife - grabbed a game-high 15 rebounds, had six steals and led all players with a plus 22. 

The Knicks held the Spurs to 40 points in the second half - 19 in the fourth quarter - and under 100 for the game. The last time San Antonio was held to under 100 points was, ironically enough, against this very same Knicks team at the Garden on March 1.

The win was New York's 12th in a row and improved their road record to 7-1, with all seven wins coming by double digits. Their point differential this postseason is an NBA record plus 281. To put that into perspective, the 2017 Golden State Warriors and the 2001 Lakers - generally acknowledged to be the two most dominant playoff teams of the last 50 years - are a plus 230 and 204 respectively.

We are witnessing something truly rare in sports; so rare, in fact, it's almost inconceivable, even for a fanbase that's old enough to remember the last time they saw their team win a title. For those not old enough, there's simply no reference point here.

The most remarkable thing about this run is how yeoman-like the Knicks have been throughout it. Not once have they gloated, pounded their chests or prematurely celebrated. They refuse to look past the next game. They are singularly focused on one thing: bringing a championship to New York. To that end, everyone is committed, from Brunson to Towns to Mikal Bridges to OG Anunoby, who had 19 points - 12 in the fourth quarter - to Landry Shamet and Jose Alvarado, who had 13 and 7 points respectively. There are no small parts or insignificant contributions. Even Mitchell Robinson, who broke his right pinky finger a week ago and was listed as questionable before the game, had six rebounds and forced Wemby into a costly turnover in the closing minutes.

The Knicks poise is matched only by their sense of professionalism. As they left the court Wednesday night, you were hard-pressed to detect a modicum of self satisfaction in their faces. Indeed, their whole demeanor in the postgame presser was that of a team that knows it will need to improve their level of play in game two if they want to extend their winning streak to 13. When asked the following day if he was looking forward to going up 2-0 in the series, KAT simply replied it was 0-0 as far as he and his teammates were concerned. How typical.

Compare and contrast that to what we heard come out of the Spurs locker room. To a man they seemed genuinely surprised they had lost the game. Many of the comments made in their postgame presser were eerily similar to those made by the Cavs and Sixers in their postgame pressers. It’s almost as if they’ve bought into the false narrative that this team is not legit. Gee, I wonder where they could've gotten that from.

The Hawks were supposed to give the Knicks a hard time; the Sixers were going to represent the East; the Cavs analytically won. For six weeks now we've heard every possible rationalization from the so-called experts that what we're seeing with our very own eyes isn't real; that it's only a mirage. Just wait until the Knicks face a real opponent from the West; then they'll come back down to Earth. There's been an astonishing lack of respect for what this team has accomplished so far during these playoffs.

Nowhere is that lack of respect more apparent than in the way Brunson has been treated. Despite the above stats, he didn't get a single first place vote for MVP this year. All this guy does is find ways to help his team win. And yet his detractors remain unconvinced. He's too small; he not a dude; he's not a 1A. It's worth noting that every player who finished ahead of him in the MVP voting, except for one, is watching the finals at home. Think about that.

The reality is that this Knicks team is not only legit; it's three wins away from winning its first NBA title since 1973. When that happens, the sight of Jalen Brunson hoisting the Larry O'Brien trophy as Finals MVP will be the ultimate comeuppance for every self-anointed genius who questioned his bonafides.

I can hardly wait.

Knicks Playoff Preview (NBA Finals)

"As long as we're here, we might as well win. There's no guarantee we're going to be back."

 - Rangers captain Dave Maloney, prior to the 1979 Stanley Cup Finals. 

This is the first time since I started this blog that I will be doing a finals preview of the Knicks. Typically by June, I'm either writing about another failed postseason by the Rangers or speculating on when the Mets will fold. So this is special for me. It's also special for millions of long-suffering Knicks fans, some of whom weren't even born the last time they made the finals.

It's fitting that the Knicks will be facing the San Antonio Spurs in this series; 27 years ago they lost to the Spurs in five, in what would become the first of five NBA titles for San Antonio over a 15 year period. Contrary to what each team's respective fanbase is boasting, this will not be a short series. Indeed, I would be shocked if it didn't go at least six games.

Since Victor Wembanyama came into the league three years ago, each team has won three games on their home court. New York's win in the NBA Cup was on a neutral site. Aside from that Cup final game, the Knicks have had two significant and memorable wins against the Spurs: a 117-114 thriller on Christmas Day last season and a 114-89 rout March 1 this season; the latter one of only three losses the Spurs had from February 1 through the end of the regular season; the other two were against the Denver Nuggets.

This postseason, New York and San Antonio have the two best defensive ratings: the Knicks at 104.4 and the Spurs at 106.1; the Knicks are shooting 40 percent from three while the Spurs are shooting 36.5 percent from three; and the Knicks bench is averaging 31.3 points per game vs 32.6 points per game for the Spurs. These two team couldn't be more close if they shared a sleeping bag.

If there's one advantage the Knicks have going for them, it's that they've played four fewer games this postseason than the Spurs. In the history of the NBA playoffs, teams that are coming off a four-game sweep are 20-4 against teams that needed a full seven games; 5-3 in the finals. Since May 4, the Knicks have played a total of eight games - four in 23 days! - while the Spurs have played 13. The Knicks will be the more rested team in this series.

And they will need every bit of that rest in order to end their 53 year drought. The Spurs may not be the 2017 Golden State Warriors, but they are most definitely NOT the Cavs or the Sixers. They represent the toughest challenge the Knicks will face in these playoffs. Don't expect any 30 point blowouts. Every game is likely to go down to the wire. If you're a fan of hotly contested series, you're in for one helluva treat.

The prevailing sentiment among the so-called experts is that this series will come down to Wembanyama vs. Jalen Brunson. After all, those are the two best players on their respective teams. Far be it for me to disagree with the experts but in my opinion, this series will come down to the wings: Mikal Bridges, OG Anunoby and Josh Hart vs. Devin Vassell, De'Aaron Fox and Julian Champagne. Off the bench, Landry Shamet and Deuce McBride will have to hold their own against Keldon Johnson and Dylan Harper.

Even allowing for all that, here are the four keys to the Knicks winning their first title since 1973.

1. KAT needs to stay out of foul trouble. Regardless of how many minutes per game Mitchell Robinson plays in this series - and the assumption is he will dress - look for the Spurs to target Karl-Anthony Towns on defense. It will be up to KAT not to take stupid fouls. To be effective, he has to be on the court, not on the bench.

2. Knicks need to make their threes. As I stated above, the Knicks are shooting 40 percent from downtown in the playoffs. That must continue in this series. If they go cold, the Spurs will win. The best way to insure that doesn't happen is by moving the ball around. The Knicks were 43-11 during the regular season when they had 25 or more assists. 

3. Make Wemby work on offense and defense. Imagine a player with the physical attributes of Hakeem Olajuwon and the shooting prowess of Steph Curry. That's who Wembanyama is. But as great as he is, the Oklahoma City Thunder still managed to limit his impact. By using a combination of Anunoby, Hart and Robinson, the Knicks hope they can wear him out. And on the other end of the court, if KAT can pull Wemby away from the basket, that will improve the Knicks chances of scoring in the paint. He can't block what he can't get to.

4. Avoid costly turnovers. Of the four teams that advanced to the conference finals, only the Thunder averaged fewer turnovers per game than the Knicks. In what promises to be a tight series, New York can't afford to be careless with the ball.

After the Rangers finally won the Stanley Cup in 1994, Sam Rosen made the pronouncement that it would "last a lifetime." Knicks fans have waited more than a lifetime to celebrate another championship. Their waiting will soon be over.

27 years ago, the Spurs were the better team. That is not the case this time around. This is the most talented roster the Knicks have had since the glory days of Clyde and Willis. Despite the trolling of the anti-New York media, these players have earned their way to a finals berth; and in another two weeks, they will earn their way to an NBA title.

Knicks in six. 

Almost Home

The New York Knicks are in the finals!

The last time that happened I still had black hair, my wife and I were on an Alaskan cruise to celebrate our fifth wedding anniversary, and Bill Clinton was in the White House. That was 27 years ago. To put that in perspective, Johnny Carson was on the air for 30.

They say time flies when you're having fun. Fun would be the last word fans of this franchise would use to describe the hell they've gone through. Between 2001 and 2020, New York made the playoffs five times, advancing to the second round once. Over that stretch, a litany of GMs from Isaiah Thomas to Phil Jackson have come and gone. 

But it wasn't until James Dolan hired Leon Rose in 2020 that things began to turn around. Rose immediately went to work rebuilding an organization that had become the laughingstock of the league. His first decision was to hire Tom Thibodeau as head coach that summer. In Thibs first season, the Knicks made the playoffs, losing in five to the Atlanta Hawks. Though it was a bitter defeat, a foundation had been laid.

Over the next few years, Rose made several significant moves. In the summer of 2022, he cleared enough cap space to sign Jalen Brunson to a four-year, $104 million contract; a move that was widely criticized at the time as an overpay. Then at the '23 trade deadline, he acquired Josh Hart from the Portland Trail Blazers for Cam Reddish. Over the summer, he signed Donte DiVencenzo.

But his boldest moves were yet to come. In December of '23, Rose traded RJ Barrett, Immanuel Quickley and a second round pick to the Toronto Raptors for OG Anunoby and Precious Achiuwa. Then in the summer of '24. he traded five first-round picks to the Brooklyn Nets for Mikal Bridges. Like the Brunson signing, this too was considered an overpay. But the final piece of the puzzle came right before the start of the 2024-25 season. In a stunner, he traded Julius Randle and DiVencenzo to the Minnesota Timberwolves for Karl-Anthony Towns. Rose had coveted the 7-0 center for years and now, at last, he had his man.

The Knicks would have their best postseason in a quarter century, beating the reigning champion Boston Celtics in six to advance the Eastern Conference finals for the first time since 2000. But the manner in which they lost to the Indiana Pacers - blowing a late fourth quarter double-digit lead in game one - did not sit well with Rose. He fired Thiboadeau and replaced him with Mike Brown.

Throughout the 2025-26 season, the Knicks displayed signs of a true contender. They won the NBA Cup in December, routed elite teams like the Denver Nuggets by 39 and the San Antonio Spurs by 25; the latter one of only three defeats the Spurs would suffer from February 1 through the end of the regular season. 

But there were also some bumps in the road. They barely beat a tanking Nets team and needed to come from behind to beat a Golden State Warriors team that was missing most of its starters. This dichotomy between greatness and underachievement was frustrating to watch, primarily because you never knew which Knicks team was going to show up. 

Going into the postseason, I wrote "the Knicks are capable of going all the way to the finals; they're also capable of being ousted in the first round." And after a game three loss that put the Hawks up 2-1, it was beginning to look like the latter was a very real possibility. The "Fire Mike Brown" contingent was in full force.

It was at that point that the Knicks had a come to Jesus moment. They went on a tear, the likes of which have rarely been seen by any New York area team. They won the next three against the Hawks, blowing them out by 51 points in game six. They then swept the Philadelphia 76ers and Cleveland Cavaliers. Both closeout games were ostensibly over by halftime.

The numbers are staggering. Of the Knicks twelve wins, eleven have been by double digits and five have been by 25 or more points; they've held their opponents to under 100 points seven times; and their point differential of +271 is the highest through three rounds in NBA history. Their defensive rating of 104.4 leads all postseason teams.

Leon Rose has done a masterful job assembling this roster, and Mike Brown has done an equally masterful job coaching it. This is not meant as a knock on Thibs, but no way in hell this team gets this far with him as coach. So dominant have they been that even some of their harshest critics have been forced to grudgingly admit that they are legit; though they still maintain that they had an easy path to the finals. Oh, well, you can't fix stupid, but you can sure as shit block it. 

Which is what I've been mostly doing. Nobody is going to rain on this parade. I've waited 27 years for this moment and I'll be damned if I'm going to let the haters take away my joy. I haven't felt this way about a team I root for since the '86 Giants went through the NFL like shit through a goose.

I believe in these players, and I believe they have what it takes to go all the way, regardless of which team they face in the finals. As for who that might be, I'm done projecting. I wanted the Raptors in the first round; I got the Hawks. I wanted the Celtics in the second round; I got the Sixers. I wanted the Pistons in the conference finals; I got the Cavs. At this point, I could care less who they play.

The New York Knicks are in the finals! 

They are four wins away from their first NBA championship since 1973. 

That was 53 years ago. 

Knicks Are the Rodney Dangerfield of the NBA

We were told the East would go through Detroit. 

We were told once Jayson Tatum returned the Celtics were the team to beat.

We were told that the Hawks would beat the Knicks.

We were told that the Sixers, after they successfully came back against the Celtics, would come out of the Eastern Conference.

You know what all those teams have in common? They're all playing golf, that's what. Meanwhile the team nobody took seriously this postseason is one win away from its first trip to the finals since 1999.

It's time to face facts. The New York Knicks have become a juggernaut. They are 11-2 this postseason. Their point differential in those 11 wins is a plus 236; in the two losses, it's a minus two.

Since January 20, the Knicks have the third best record in the NBA (39-13), the number one net rating (12.5), the number one offensive rating (120.9) and the number one defensive rating (108.4).

In 13 playoff games, they've won by 25 points or more four times; held opponents to under 100 points six times; and allowed more than 110 points just once: the closeout game against the Sixers. 

And yet, despite that, they get all the respect of Rodney Dangerfield. Even now, the same geniuses who dismissed them during the regular season are now bending themselves into a pretzel trying to discount what they are doing in the postseason. You should hear some of them.

"They haven't beaten anyone in the playoffs."

"They've had the cheapest run to the finals in NBA history."

"Analytically we've won two out of three on the expected score."

That last gem came from Kenny Atkinson, who apparently doesn't know his team is trailing 3-0 in the series. From what we've seen on the court, his players are just as clueless.

Meanwhile in the Western Conference - you know, the supposedly superior one - the Oklahoma City Thunder and San Antonio Spurs have beaten the likes of the Phoenix Suns (4-0), the L.A. Lakers (4-0), the Portland Trailblazers (4-1) and Minnesota Timberwolves (4-2). None, except for maybe the T-Wolves, were considered legitimate contenders going into the season. Yet to hear it from the so-called "experts," either of those teams would wipe the floor with whomever comes out of the East. I swear if stupidity were an Olympic event, these bozos would win the gold. You can't make this shit up, even if you tried.

First of all, if the Knicks were to win the championship, they wouldn't be the first team to have a "cheap" run. In 2023, the Nuggets beat an 8th, 4th, 7th and 8th seed; in 2024, the Celtics beat an 8th, 4th, 6th and 5th seed; and in 2025, the Thunder beat an 8th, 4th, 6th and 4th seed. Not one of those teams had a 10-game win streak during their march to a title, or for that matter the highest margin of victory or highest point differential like the Knicks currently do.

Second of all, why is that even relevant? Where is it written that success in the postseason has to be qualified? History is replete with examples of lady luck shining on teams. You think Knicks fans care one iota that their team didn't have to face the Celtics or Pistons to get to the finals? Not in the least. You play the hand your dealt. Anything else is sour grapes.

If anything, I've been impressed with this team's discipline and demeanor. Not since the 1998 and 99 Yankees have we seen a New York area team dominate like these Knicks. They haven't once pounded their chests or counted their chickens before they're hatched. Even now, on the eve of what could be their greatest accomplishment in more than a quarter century, they are laser focused on the task ahead.

In 1994, the Rangers finally broke their 54 year drought and won the Stanley Cup. Who's to say this isn't the year the Knicks finally break their 53 year drought and win the championship?

Go, New York, Go, New York, Go!